Lifestyle factors and other predictors of common mental disorders in diagnostic machine learning studies: A...

Machine Learning (ML) models have been used to predict common mental disorders (CMDs) and may provide insights into the key modifiable factors that can identify and predict CMD risk and be targeted through interventions. This systematic review aimed to synthesise evidence from ML studies predicting CMDs, evaluate their performance, and establish the potential benefit of incorporating lifestyle data in ML models alongside biological and/or demographic-environmental factors.

This systematic review adheres to the PRISMA statement (Prospero CRD42023401194). Databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, IEEE Xplore, Engineering Village, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception to 28/08/24. Included studies used ML methods with feature importance to predict CMDs in adults. Risk of bias (ROB) was assessed using PROBAST. Model performance metrics were compared. The ten most important variables reported by each study were assigned to broader categories to evaluate their frequency across studies.

117 studies were included (111 model development-only, 16 development and validation). Deep learning methods showed best accuracy for predicting CMD cases. Studies commonly incorporated features from multiple categories (n = 56), and frequently identified demographic-environmental predictors in their top ten most important variables (63/69 models). These tended to be in combination with psycho-social and biological variables (n = 15). Lifestyle data were infrequently examined as sole predictors of CMDs across included studies (4.27 %). Studies commonly had high heterogeneity and ROB ratings.

This review is the first to evaluate the utility of diagnostic ML for CMDs, assess their ROB, and evaluate predictor types. CMDs were able to be predicted, however studies had high ROB and lifestyle data were underutilised, precluding full identification of a robust predictor set.