Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Echocardiographic Assessment Using Subxiphoid-Only Examination for Hypotensive Patients
Published on: April 18, 2025
Laboratory parameters as diagnostic indicators in venous hypertensive myelopathy
Yinqing Wang1, Shuangshuang Liu2, Hongjun Hao3
1Department of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China.
Background Context:
Venous hypertension is a rare cause of myelopathy that can be misdiagnosed as myelitis and be worsened by glucocorticosteroids.
Purpose:
This study is aims to identify a fluid biomarker with diagnostic value in Venous Hypertensive Myelopathy (VHM).
Study Design:
a retrospective diagnostic study.
Patient Sample:
The patients diagnosed as having myelopathy between December 2020 and June 2022 were divided into a VHM group (n=71) and an inflammatory myelopathy (IM) group (n=123). A noninflammatory neurological disorders (NIND) group (n=53) was also acquired as baseline control.
Outcome Measures:
The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the fluid biomarkers in the VHM and IM groups.
Methods:
The albumin, immunoglobulins, oligoclonal bands, neuron-specific enolase, myelin basic protein, and S100β were measured in their cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and paired serum samples. Potential diagnostic biomarkers were screened through univariate and collinearity analyses. The diagnostic performance of these biomarkers was assessed by plotting the receiver-operating characteristic curves. Additionally, the predictive value of clinical factors and biomarkers for diagnosis was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis.
Results:
The quantitative and normalized CSF-S100β values were significantly lower in the VHM group (p<.05). Analysis of receiver-operating characteristic curves adjusted for age and sex showed that the normalized CSF-S100β discriminated between VHM and IM (area under the curve (AUC) 0.884, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.817-0.938). Particularly, it performed well in the AUC for normalized CSF-S100β (AUC 0.9400, 95% CI 0.8621-1.000) when oligoclonal bands and flow-void sign were negative.
Conclusions:
The normalized CSF-S100β can differentiate between VHM and IM.
Related Concept Videos
01:27Assessment of the Cardiovascular System III: Palpation
Jugular Venous Pressure (JVP) Measurement
Position the patient at a thirty- to forty-five-degree angle or in a semi-fowler's position. Look for the highest point of pulsation in the internal jugular vein and measure the vertical distance to the angle of Loius or sternal angle. A normal JVP is 3-4 cm above...
01:10Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.