Patient-reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials evaluating BRAF inhibitors in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a systematic scoping review of quality of reporting and trial results
- 1Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Innsbruck Medical University, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck, Austria.
- 2Data Center and Health Outcomes Research Unit, Italian Group for Adult Haematologic Diseases (GIMEMA), Rome, Italy.
- 0Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Innsbruck Medical University, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck, Austria.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.This review of BRAF inhibitor trials for advanced melanoma found patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were secondary endpoints, often using generic tools. Improved PRO reporting quality is needed for better treatment tolerability assessments.
Area Of Science
- Oncology
- Clinical Trials
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background
- Advanced melanoma treatment often involves BRAF inhibitors.
- Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial for assessing treatment tolerability.
- Current practices in PRO assessment within BRAF inhibitor trials require evaluation.
Purpose Of The Study
- To overview current PRO assessment practices in advanced melanoma trials using BRAF inhibitors.
- To extract data on symptomatic adverse events (AEs) from clinician reports.
- To inform future PRO measurement strategies for clinical trials.
Main Methods
- Systematic scoping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed on PubMed.
- Included RCTs evaluated BRAF inhibitors with PRO endpoints.
- Data extraction on RCT characteristics, clinical results, and PROs; quality assessment using CONSORT-PRO checklist.
Main Results
- Nine RCTs met inclusion criteria, with PROs as secondary or exploratory endpoints.
- The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was predominantly used for PRO measurement.
- PRO reporting quality varied, with frequent omissions in handling missing data and PRO hypotheses.
- Twenty-nine symptomatic AEs were identified as suitable for direct patient reporting.
Conclusions
- Findings can guide the PRO component of future BRAF inhibitor RCTs, focusing on comprehensive tolerability assessment.
- There is a need to enhance the quality of PRO reporting to maximize the impact of findings.
- Optimizing PRO measures requires careful selection of symptoms and AEs for patient reporting.
Related Experiment Videos
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.
Contact us if these videos are not relevant.

