Patient-reported outcomes in randomized controlled trials evaluating BRAF inhibitors in patients with cutaneous melanoma: a systematic scoping review of quality of reporting and trial results

  • 0Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy, Psychosomatics, and Medical Psychology, Innsbruck Medical University, University Hospital of Psychiatry II, Innsbruck, Austria.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

This review of BRAF inhibitor trials for advanced melanoma found patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were secondary endpoints, often using generic tools. Improved PRO reporting quality is needed for better treatment tolerability assessments.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Trials
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background

  • Advanced melanoma treatment often involves BRAF inhibitors.
  • Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are crucial for assessing treatment tolerability.
  • Current practices in PRO assessment within BRAF inhibitor trials require evaluation.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To overview current PRO assessment practices in advanced melanoma trials using BRAF inhibitors.
  • To extract data on symptomatic adverse events (AEs) from clinician reports.
  • To inform future PRO measurement strategies for clinical trials.

Main Methods

  • Systematic scoping review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) indexed on PubMed.
  • Included RCTs evaluated BRAF inhibitors with PRO endpoints.
  • Data extraction on RCT characteristics, clinical results, and PROs; quality assessment using CONSORT-PRO checklist.

Main Results

  • Nine RCTs met inclusion criteria, with PROs as secondary or exploratory endpoints.
  • The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire was predominantly used for PRO measurement.
  • PRO reporting quality varied, with frequent omissions in handling missing data and PRO hypotheses.
  • Twenty-nine symptomatic AEs were identified as suitable for direct patient reporting.

Conclusions

  • Findings can guide the PRO component of future BRAF inhibitor RCTs, focusing on comprehensive tolerability assessment.
  • There is a need to enhance the quality of PRO reporting to maximize the impact of findings.
  • Optimizing PRO measures requires careful selection of symptoms and AEs for patient reporting.