Evaluation of a Digital Home Weight Monitoring Program for Infants With Cleft Palate

Thomas J Sitzman1,2,3, Kayla Tymous1, Megan Halvorson1

  • 1Phoenix Children's Center for Cleft and Craniofacial Care a Division of Plastic Surgery, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Insights

Digital home monitoring for infants with cleft palate did not reduce malnutrition rates but decreased speech-language pathology visits. The program identifies feeding issues but doesn't solve all malnutrition causes.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric care
  • Medical technology
  • Cleft lip and palate research

Background:

  • Infants with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) require careful monitoring for feeding and growth.
  • Traditional monitoring involves frequent in-person clinic visits, which can be burdensome for families.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the effectiveness of a digital home monitoring program for infants with CP±L.
  • To compare this program against traditional in-person clinic visit monitoring.

Main Methods:

  • A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a metropolitan pediatric hospital.
  • 88 infants with CP±L were analyzed: 41 in the digital home monitoring group and 47 in the traditional in-person visit group.
  • Digital monitoring involved weekly caregiver submission of infant weights and feeding evaluations via a secure website.

Main Results:

  • No significant difference in the incidence of malnutrition at 4 months of age between the two groups (13% vs 17%).
  • Infants in the digital home monitoring program had significantly fewer in-person speech-language pathology visits (3.9 vs 5.4).
  • Malnutrition was associated with Child Protective Services involvement and the presence of a syndrome.

Conclusions:

  • Digital home monitoring for infants with CP±L did not reduce malnutrition incidence.
  • The program effectively reduced the need for in-person speech-language pathology visits.
  • While capable of identifying infants with feeding challenges, the program does not fully address multifactorial malnutrition contributors.