Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 7, 2026

Implantation of Human-Sized Coronary Stents into Rat Abdominal Aorta Using a Trans-Femoral Access
Published on: November 19, 2020
Efficacy of IVUS-guided stent implantation in patients with complex CAD: a meta-analysis based on RCTs
Anyi Xu1, Dongying Wang1, Bangsheng Chen2
1The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University (Zhejiang Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Insights
Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation significantly reduces major adverse cardiovascular events and cardiac death in complex coronary artery disease (CAD). This guidance method offers improved outcomes compared to standard non-IVUS guidance for CAD patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Medicine
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- Complex coronary artery disease (CAD) presents significant challenges for effective stent implantation.
- Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) offers detailed visualization of coronary anatomy, potentially improving procedural outcomes.
- The comparative efficacy of IVUS-guided versus non-IVUS-guided stent implantation in complex CAD remains an area of investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically evaluate the efficacy of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation compared to non-IVUS guidance in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD).
- To analyze key clinical outcomes including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death, and revascularization procedures.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was performed across major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, Embase).
- Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing IVUS-guided and non-IVUS-guided stent implantation in complex CAD.
- Statistical analysis utilized relative ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) to compare outcomes.
Main Results:
- Six RCTs involving 5,173 patients were analyzed.
- IVUS guidance was associated with a significant reduction in MACE (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.82), cardiac death (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.85), target vessel revascularization (TVR), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and stent thrombosis (ST).
- No significant differences were found in the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) or all-cause death between the groups.
Conclusions:
- Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided stent implantation demonstrates superior efficacy in reducing adverse cardiovascular events and mortality in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD).
- The findings suggest that IVUS guidance should be considered for optimizing stent implantation strategies in complex CAD cases.
Background:
This study is to investigate the efficacy of stent implantation in patients with complex coronary artery disease (CAD) under intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guidance and non-IVUS guidance.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Web of Science, Cochran, and Embase for the articles of IVUS-guided and non-IVUS-guided stent implantation in patients with complex CAD and reported related outcomes. We included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac death and other outcome indicators. Relative ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used for statistical analysis.
Results:
A total of 5,173 subjects were included in 6 randomized control trials. The results showed that the incidence of MACE (RR: 0.63, 95% CI: 0.49-0.82, P < 0.001), cardiac death (RR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.44-0.85, P = 0.004), target vessel revascularization (TVR) (P = 0.01), target lesion revascularization (TLR) (P = 0.03) and stent thrombosis (ST) (P = 0.002) in the experimental group (IVUS-guidance) was lower than that in the control group (non-IVUS-guidance). However, no statistical difference was observed between the both groups in the incidence of MI (P = 0.13) and all-cause death (P = 0.41).
Conclusions:
Compared with the non-IVUS-guided group, IVUS-guided stent implantation may be more effective for patients with complex CAD.
Systematic Review Registration:
PROSPERO [CRD42024531366].
More Related Videos
08:12Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies