Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

04:55
Using a Thermal Camera to Measure Heat Loss Through Bird Feather Coats
Published on: June 17, 2020
3.5K
From feather pecking to immunity: Immune differences between lines selected for high and low feather pecking
Tanja Hofmann1, Sonja Schmucker1, Werner Bessei2
1Behavioral Physiology of Livestock, Institute of Animal Science, University of Hohenheim, Garbenstr. 17, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Brain, Behavior, and Immunity
|December 14, 2024
Summary
Feather pecking in hens is linked to immune system differences. High feather pecking birds show altered T cell immunity, suggesting a connection between behavior and immune cell function.
Area of Science:
- Animal behavior
- Immunology
- Genetics
Background:
- Feather pecking (FP) is a significant welfare issue in laying hens, causing feather damage and cannibalism.
- The underlying mechanisms of FP are not fully understood, but a link to the immune system is increasingly discussed.
- Human studies show connections between personality traits like impulsivity and immune system alterations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate immunological differences between laying hens selectively bred for high (HFP) and low (LFP) feather pecking behavior.
- To explore the hypothesis that feather pecking may be an immune-related behavioral response.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of leukocyte subsets in blood, spleen, and cecal tonsils.
- Assessment of mitogen-induced lymphocyte proliferation response.
- Measurement of antibody concentrations in HFP and LFP hens.
Main Results:
- Divergent selection successfully altered FP behavior, with HFP hens exhibiting significantly more pecking.
- HFP hens had reduced numbers of T helper cells, CD4+ CD25high cells, and B cells.
- HFP hens showed enhanced T cell proliferation to ConA but reduced T cell-dependent B cell proliferation to PWM.
Conclusions:
- Significant immunological differences exist between HFP and LFP hens, particularly in T cell immunity.
- These findings support the hypothesis that feather pecking behavior is associated with immune system alterations.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Selection
40.1K
Natural selection influences the frequencies of particular alleles and phenotypes within populations in several different ways. Primarily, natural selection can be directional, stabilizing, or disruptive. Directional selection favors one extreme trait and shifts the population towards that phenotype while selecting against individuals displaying alternate traits. Stabilizing selection favors an intermediate trait with a narrow range of variation. Deviation from the optimal phenotype towards an...
40.1K
Mate Choice
8.0K
Mate choice—the decision about whom to mate with—is a type of natural selection, since animals must reproduce to pass down their genes. Mate choice is also called intersexual selection because the behavior occurs between the sexes.
8.0K
Complementation Tests
4.8K
A complementation test is a simple cross to identify whether the two mutations are located on the same gene or different genes. It was first performed by Edward Lewis in the 1940s while working on fruit flies. He developed the test to identify the location and arrangement of different mutations on chromosomes.
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
Organisms heterozygous for different mutations are crossed pairwise in all combinations. If present on different genes, the mutations can complement each other by providing the missing...
4.8K
Limits to Natural Selection
31.1K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
31.1K
Frequency-dependent Selection
21.8K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
21.8K
Epistasis
45.8K
In addition to multiple alleles at the same locus influencing traits, numerous genes or alleles at different locations may interact and influence phenotypes in a phenomenon called epistasis. For example, rabbit fur can be black or brown depending on whether the animal is homozygous dominant or heterozygous at a TYRP1 locus. However, if the rabbit is also homozygous recessive at a locus on the tyrosinase gene (TYR), it will have an unshaded coat that appears white, regardless of its TYRP1...
45.8K

