Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Graft Options

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the most common orthopaedic sports medicine surgeries. Its prevalence in the sports medicine sphere is matched by the numerous options of different techniques. Chief among these is graft selection, which most commonly falls into 1 of 4 options: bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring tendon autograft (HT), quadriceps tendon autograft, and allografts. The most frequently used allografts include BPTB, HT, tibialis anterior or posterior tendon, and Achilles tendon. Each graft option possesses unique advantages and disadvantages. BPTB autograft demonstrates the fastest incorporation via bone-to-bone healing. It also yields a lower revision rate and greater return-to-sport rate compared with HT. However, because of donor-site morbidity, anterior knee pain and kneeling pain can occur. There is also a small risk of patellar fracture as well as patellar tendon rupture. HT autograft requires a smaller incision than BPTB and preserves the extensor mechanism. Patients are at risk for knee flexion weakness, saphenous nerve injury, and potential graft loosening over time secondary to bone tunnel widening. Quadriceps tendon autograft may be harvested with minimally invasive techniques. As with HT, the all soft-tissue composition allows use in skeletally immature patients. Although early studies show promise, knee extension weakness has been documented, and long-term outcomes are less clear. Allograft possesses no donor-site morbidity and reduced surgical time; however, allografts are associated with the greatest failure rate in young athletes and a lower return-to-sport rate compared with autografts. They also incur a greater financial cost than autografts. To be proficient at performing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, it is important that the sports medicine surgeon be well versed in the various graft options and the ideal patient populations for whom they are best used.