Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Retzius-Sparing Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
Published on: May 19, 2022
Avoiding prostate bed radiation for the PSMA-PET detected nodal recurrence patient post prostatectomy
Benjamin Challis1,2, Andrew Kneebone1,2,3,4, Thomas Eade1,2,3,4
1Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Radiation Oncology Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Background:
Nodal only recurrence post radical prostatectomy (RP) is increasingly recognised in the PSMA scan era. Management is controversial with a curative approach usually incorporating prostate bed and nodal irradiation (PB + NRT) in combination with long-term hormonal therapy. It is unknown whether omitting prostate-bed irradiation (PBRT) is safe in a subgroup of these patients.
Purpose:
To document the outcomes for pelvic nodal only salvage radiation therapy (NRT) plus concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for patients with PSMA PET documented nodal relapses.
Methods And Materials:
Eligible patients included PSMA PET documented nodal only relapses post RP who received NRT with or without PBRT at Royal North Shore Hospital (NSCC), Gosford Hospital (CCCC) or Genesis Care (GC) between January 2015 and December 2021. Baseline demographics, surgical pathology, radiation details, ADT use and outcomes were documented.
Results:
Forty-six patients were identified, 22 in the PB + NRT cohort and 24 in the NRT cohort. Compared to the PBRT + NRT group, the NRT cohort had lower stage disease (pT2 = 7 (29 %), pT3a = 15 (63 %), pT3b = 1 (4 %) vs pT2 = 0, pT3a = 10 (45 %), pT3b = 12 (55 %)) (p=<0.001) and lower rates of R1 resection (0 % vs 63.6 % (n = 14)) (p < 0.001) respectively. The median follow-up from radiotherapy was 3.9 years.Four-year biochemical failure- free survival (BFFS) was 64 % in the NRT group vs 67 % in the PB + NRT group. Of the ten (41.6 %) failures in the NRT group, 1 (4 %) was a biochemical failure only, 2 (8 %) recurred in the PB and received further salvage treatment, 4 (17 %) had nodal failure outside the pelvis and 3 (13 %) had distant metastases.One patient (4 %) in the NRT group recorded late grade ≥2 GU toxicity compared with 7 (32 %) in the PB + NRT. No patients in the NRT group recorded late grade ≥2 GI toxicity compared with 2 (9 %) in the PB + NRT cohort.
Conclusion:
This study provides early evidence for the feasibility of PBRT sparing to avoid local toxicity. Most patients in this cohort failed distantly. This data suggests that for selected men PB-avoidance may be considered given informed consent.
