Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The insanity defense: a difficult necessity.

J J McGrath

    Hospital & Community Psychiatry
    |January 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary

    The insanity defense should be kept but modified, recognizing that a defendant

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The cost of mental disorders: a systematic review.

    Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2020
    Same author

    Comorbidity within mental disorders: a comprehensive analysis based on 145 990 survey respondents from 27 countries.

    Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences·2020
    Same author

    Disentangling schizophrenia spectrum disorders.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2018
    Same author

    Smokin' hot: adolescent smoking and the risk of psychosis.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2018
    Same author

    Psychotic experiences and religiosity: data from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys.

    Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica·2018
    Same author

    Dopamine, psychosis and schizophrenia: the widening gap between basic and clinical neuroscience.

    Translational psychiatry·2018

    Area of Science:

    • Forensic Psychiatry
    • Legal Psychology

    Background:

    • The insanity defense is a complex legal and ethical issue.
    • Societal protection and individual culpability are key considerations.
    • Psychiatrists' roles in assessing mental illness within the judicial system are debated.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the merits of the insanity defense.
    • To explore the role of psychiatric assessment in legal proceedings.
    • To propose modifications to the insanity defense and psychiatrists' responsibilities.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal and psychiatric principles.
    • Analysis of the interplay between mental state, culpability, and punishment.
    • Consideration of the limitations of expert testimony in adversarial settings.

    Main Results:

    • Sanity is crucial for both culpability and punishment.
    • Protecting society from harmful acts is a fundamental principle.
    • Psychiatric assessment of mental illness, not prediction, is the appropriate role.

    Conclusions:

    • The insanity defense should be retained but revised.
    • Psychiatrists should advocate for mentally ill individuals within the legal system.
    • Addressing the limitations of expert testimony is necessary.

    Related Experiment Videos