Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Technique and Patient Selection Criteria of Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy for Minimal Access Aortic Valve Replacement
Published on: March 26, 2018
Implementing and evaluating shared decision-making before transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a dedicated
Ermes Carulli1,2, Suzy Browne1, Sara Woolley1
1Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Department of Cardiology, Hill End Rd, Harefield, Uxbridge UB9 6JH, UK.
Implementing a structured shared decision-making (SDM) pathway significantly improved patient satisfaction and positive responses for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) decisions. This approach enhances patient engagement in choosing between TAVI, surgery, or conservative care.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a key alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
- Shared decision-making (SDM) is crucial for patient-centered care but is often underutilized.
- Informed patient preference is vital when choosing between TAVI, surgery, or conservative management.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a structured SDM pathway for patients undergoing evaluation for aortic valve stenosis.
- To assess the impact of the SDM pathway on patient satisfaction and decision-making quality.
Main Methods:
- A structured SDM pathway was established, incorporating decision aids and dedicated meetings.
- A custom questionnaire assessed patient satisfaction using a 12-core question Likert scale (1-5).
- Patient responses were compared pre- and post-implementation of the SDM pathway.
Main Results:
- Global patient satisfaction significantly increased post-SDM pathway implementation (mean Likert score 4.46 vs. 3.78, P < 0.001).
- The percentage of positive responses (Likert 4-5) was significantly higher in the post-SDM group (92.6% vs. 66.2%, P < 0.001).
- Negative responses (Likert 1-2) significantly decreased in the post-SDM group (1.6% vs. 22.6%, P < 0.001).
Conclusions:
- The structured SDM pathway effectively facilitates shared decision-making in line with guidelines.
- This model, potentially leveraging digital tools, can be adapted for other treatments and institutions.
- The pathway enhances patient satisfaction and engagement in treatment choices for aortic valve stenosis.
More Related Videos
06:59Improved Registration of 3D CT Angiography with X-ray Fluoroscopy for Image Fusion During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: June 3, 2018
09:57Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022