Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

From Molecules to Materials: Engineering New Ionic Liquid Crystals Through Halogen Bonding
Published on: March 24, 2018
Role of Counterion in the Adsorption of Ionic Amphiphiles at Fluid Interfaces
Klaus Lunkenheimer1, Katrina Geggel1, Rolf Hirte2
1Max-Planck-Institut für Kolloid und Grenzflächenforschung, D-14476 Potsdam, Germany.
Abstract:
This communication represents the chemical alternative to the previous two papers dealing with the influence of positively charged alkali cations on the adsorption properties of the series of the standard surfactant system of alkali-perfluorocarbon octanoates. Now, this contribution describes the adsorption properties of the negatively charged cationic surfactant series of trimethyldodecyl-ammonium halides. In our latest contributions, we have put forward a new model of adsorption of ionic surfactants. It says that the surface excess of the adsorbed anionic surfactant is exclusively determined by the cross-sectional area of the positive counterion. This, however, has been demonstrated by applying relevant, positively charged (alkali) counterions only, i.e., by anionic surfactants. In this article, we extend the new model to negatively charged counterions (halides) applying the cationic standard surfactant series of the trimethyldodecylammonium-halides. A big difference between the hydration behavior of the positively charged alkali and the negatively charged counterions has become striking. Thus, for example, whereas the ratio between the naked ion radius of the cesium and of the lithium cation is almost 2-fold, it is practically equal for the chloride and the iodide anion. Surprisingly, however, the relevant adsorption data are practically identical. This means that the bigger, negatively charged halide counterions interact considerably more strongly with their residual ionic surfactant group than the positively charged alkali cations with theirs. Due to this, the size of the hydrated negative halide ions is considerably greater than that of the relevant positive alkali ions. These specialties can well be explained by the Stern model of charge distribution across a naked ion's surface. It shows that for the electrostatic interaction between counterion and ionic surfactant headgroup, the peculiarities of the polar solvent of water will play a crucial role, too. By these investigations our new model of adsorption of ionic amphiphiles is further extended and gives finally evidence that it is of general validity.
More Related Videos
09:43Study of Short Peptide Adsorption on Solution Dispersed Inorganic Nanoparticles Using Depletion Method
Published on: April 11, 2020
08:06Merging Ion Concentration Polarization between Juxtaposed Ion Exchange Membranes to Block the Propagation of the Polarization Zone
Published on: February 23, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Intermolecular Forces
Ion Exchange
Colloids
Factors Affecting Activity Coefficient
The activity coefficient value for an ion is close to one when the solution has almost zero ionic strength, i.e., when the solution shows close to ideal behavior. As the ionic strength of the solution increases from 0 to 0.1 mol/L, a...
Colloidal precipitates
Aqueous Solutions and Heats of Hydration
When ionic compounds dissolve in water, the ions in the solid separate and disperse uniformly throughout the solution because water molecules surround and solvate the ions, reducing the strong electrostatic forces between them. This process...