BRAND: Brand recognition and attitude norms database.
Carolina Raffaelli1, Elena Bocchi2, Zachary Estes2,3
1University of California San Diego, La Jolla, USA. craffaelli@ucsd.edu.
Behavior Research Methods
|December 16, 2024
Summary
Researchers created the Brand Recognition and Attitude Norms Database (BRAND), a free dataset of consumer responses to over 500 brands and logos. This resource aids research in consumer behavior and marketing.
Area of Science:
- Consumer Psychology
- Marketing Science
- Data Science
Background:
- Brand research has grown significantly, yet a comprehensive, free dataset of consumer responses to branding stimuli is lacking.
- Existing research lacks accessible, standardized data on consumer perceptions of brands and logos.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate the Brand Recognition and Attitude Norms Database (BRAND), a novel, free dataset.
- To provide a comprehensive resource for consumer responses to branding stimuli, including familiarity, liking, and memory.
Main Methods:
- Collected 244,400 raw data points from 2000 US consumers over two years (2020 and 2024).
- Aggregated data into 5,356 primary data points for over 500 brands and logos across 32 industries.
- Validated the dataset for reliability, face validity, external validity, robustness, cross-validity, and discriminant validity.
Main Results:
- The Brand Recognition and Attitude Norms Database (BRAND) offers a methodologically transparent and freely available resource.
- The dataset includes measures of brand familiarity, liking (attitudes), and memory (recognition).
- Data demonstrate strong validity and robustness across samples and time.
Conclusions:
- BRAND is the most extensive, free dataset of consumer responses to branding stimuli available.
- It facilitates hypothesis testing and stimulus selection in consumer behavior, psychology, economics, management, and marketing research.
- This database significantly aids research by providing reliable and accessible data on brand perception.
Related Concept Videos
Attitudes
28.2K
Attitude is our evaluation of a person, an idea, or an object. We have attitudes for many things ranging from products that we might pick up in the supermarket to people around the world to political policies. Typically, attitudes are favorable or unfavorable: positive or negative (Eagly & Chaiken, 1993). And, they have three components: an affective component (feelings), a behavioral component (the effect of the attitude on behavior), and a cognitive component (belief and knowledge;...
28.2K
Social Proof
27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Routes of Persuasion
63.8K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
63.8K
Stereotype Content Model
14.0K
The Stereotype Content Model (SCM) was first proposed by Susan Fiske and her colleagues (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick & Xu, 2002; see also Fiske, 2012 and Fiske, 2017). The SCM specifies that when someone encounters a new group, they will stereotype them based on two metrics: warmth—or that group’s perceived intent, and how likely they are to provide help or inflict harm—and competence—or their ability to carry out that objective. Depending on the warmth-competence...
14.0K
Conformity
45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K
The Representativeness Heuristic
15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K


