Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025

Quantification of Levator Ani Hiatus Enlargement by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Males and Females with Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Published on: April 17, 2019
Functional Assessment of Anal Sphincter with Transperineal Ultrasound and Its Relationship to Anal Continence
Yaman Degirmenci1, Joscha Steetskamp1, Roxana Schwab1
1Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Medical Center of Johannes Gutenberg University, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Background/Objectives:
Anal incontinence is linked to pelvic floor dysfunction. Diagnosis involves assessing both the function and structure of the anorectal unit. Although transperineal ultrasound has gained attention as a less invasive option, its effectiveness as a diagnostic tool for evaluating the relationship between structure and function is still debated. This study aimed to explore the relationship between quantitative measurements of anal sphincter and pelvic floor structures as well as the subjective symptoms and objective assessments of sphincter function regarding anal incontinence.
Methods:
50 women with pelvic floor dysfunction were recruited for the study. The severity of anal incontinence was assessed using the CACP score. Ultrasound imaging was employed to measure anal sphincter area, while sphincter pressures were evaluated through manometry. The relationships between variables were analyzed using Pearson's and Spearman's correlation tests.
Results:
The mean anal sphincter area was 5.51 cm2 at rest and 4.06 cm2 during maximal contraction. Resting anal sphincter pressure had an average of 46.29 mmHg, and contraction pressure averaged 103.25 mmHg. No significant correlation was found between the anal sphincter area and pressure at rest (r = 0.018) or during contraction (r = -0.210). However, a moderate correlation was observed between the change in sphincter pressure and area during contraction (r = 0.312). The CACP score showed no significant correlation with the sphincter area at rest (r = -0.084) but was weakly correlated during contraction (r = -0.270).
Conclusions:
Conventional diagnostic tools for evaluating anal incontinence can be uncomfortable and are not always readily available. Perineal sonography presents a promising, less invasive alternative for dynamic assessment of the anal sphincter.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Assessment of the Abdomen I: Inspection and Auscultation
The abdominal examination is a cornerstone of clinical medicine, serving as a critical tool in diagnosing various gastrointestinal (GI) diseases. It involves a systematic approach that includes inspection and auscultation, each with distinct yet complementary roles in assessing the abdomen. This article will delve into these two primary methods healthcare professionals use to examine the abdomen.
Inspection of the Abdomen
The first step in any abdominal examination is inspection....
Assessment of the Abdomen II: Percussion
Percussion
Percussion is an essential...
Assessment of the Abdomen III: Palpation
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):

