Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 5, 2025
Rapid Point-of-Care Assay of Enoxaparin Anticoagulant Efficacy in Whole Blood
Published on: October 12, 2012
A Comprehensive Clinical Assessment of the LumiraDx International Normalized Ratio (INR) Assay for Point-of-Care
Riffat Munir1, Elise Schapkaitz2, Lara Noble1
1Wits Diagnostic Innovation Hub, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2193, South Africa.
Background:
The International Normalized Ratio (INR) monitors anticoagulant treatment but relies on laboratory-based services. This could limit access to rapid monitoring and increase the diagnostic delay, both of which may be addressed by point-of-care testing (POCT). This study investigated the LumiraDx POC platform for INR monitoring.
Methods:
INR was measured on recalcified residual venous (n = 94) specimens from Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital and capillary blood specimens (n = 254) from consenting enrolled participants at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital Anticoagulation clinic, Johannesburg, South Africa. Standard-of-care (SOC) INR was measured on sodium-citrated venous blood using the Sysmex-CS2500 platform (Siemens Healthcare) and Neoplastin-R (Roche Diagnostics and Diagnostica Stago, Paris, France) within 2 h post-venipuncture. Within run, precision was measured using 2 LumiraDx control levels. The statistical agreement of paired INR measurements was also stratified by dosing decision.
Results:
The precision was within the manufacturer's claim for controls (level 1%CV: 3.63, level 2%CV: 2.24). Accuracy analysis showed a moderate overall agreement compared to the SOC INR results with a correlation coefficient of 0.94 (95% Cl, (0.9267 to 0.9497)). The overall precision (ρ > 0.9) and accuracy (Cb = 0.9842) were good with an absolute bias of 0.07. The 95% confidence intervals for the slope and intercept did not include 1.00 and 0.00, respectively; however, the total calculated error was within the minimal acceptable limits.
Conclusion:
The LumiraDx INR Test showed a good performance compared to laboratory-based testing and provided opportunity for rapid and patient-centric care. Owing to an increasing positive bias for INR > 3.5, confirmation with laboratory INR measurements may be required.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
01:11Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
01:30Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins