Improving the Calibration of Low-Cost Sensors Using Data Assimilation

Diego Alberto Aranda Britez1, Alejandro Tapia Córdoba1, Princy Johnson2

  • 1Department of Engineering, Universidad Loyola Andalucía, Avda. de las Universidades, s/n, Dos Hermanas, 41704 Seville, Spain.

PubMed
Summary

Accurate soil moisture monitoring in smart agriculture is improved using data assimilation to calibrate low-cost sensors. The particle filter (PF) method enhanced accuracy by 84.8%, outperforming the Iterative Ensemble Smoother (IES).

Related Concept Videos

Instrument Calibration01:12

Instrument Calibration

Instrument calibration is essential for ensuring that instruments produce accurate and consistent results. It is vital in manufacturing, healthcare, testing laboratories, and scientific research. Calibration processes are specific to each instrument and help enhance data accuracy. Each instrument has a unique calibration process tailored to its design and function to improve data accuracy.
Analytical Balance Calibration
An analytical balance measures mass and requires regular calibration to...
152
Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares01:20

Calibration Curves: Linear Least Squares

A calibration curve is a plot of the instrument's response against a series of known concentrations of a substance. This curve is used to set the instrument response levels, using the substance and its concentrations as standards. Alternatively, or additionally, an equation is fitted to the calibration curve plot and subsequently used to calculate the unknown concentrations of other samples reliably.
For data that follow a straight line, the standard method for fitting is the linear...
1.2K
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
60