Immune Response to the 13-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine Is Reduced in Infants Immunized During the

Ron Dagan1, Bart A van der Beek1

  • 1Faculty of Health Sciences, The Shraga Segal Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Genetics, Ben Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel.

Insights

Infant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) responses may be blunted when given during respiratory viral seasons, especially with higher valency vaccines like PCV13. PCV7 responses were unaffected, indicating increased susceptibility to immune blunting with PCV13.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Vaccinology
  • Pediatrics

Background:

  • Infant vaccination schedules often coincide with peak respiratory viral seasons.
  • The impact of concurrent viral infections on vaccine immunogenicity is a critical consideration for public health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether infant pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) administration during the respiratory viral season (RVS) blunts immune responses.
  • To compare the immunogenicity of 13-valent (PCV13) versus 7-valent (PCV7) pneumococcal conjugate vaccines when administered during RVS versus non-RVS.

Main Methods:

  • Post-hoc analysis of a randomized trial comparing PCV13 and PCV7 in infants.
  • Defined RVS (December-April) and non-RVS (June-October) based on local epidemiology.
  • Compared serotype-specific immunoglobulin-G geometric mean concentrations (SSIgG-GMC) at 7 and 13 months between seasons.

Main Results:

  • PCV13 recipients during RVS showed significantly lower SSIgG-GMCs for most serotypes at 7 months compared to non-RVS.
  • This blunting effect was partially corrected after the booster dose for PCV13.
  • PCV7 recipients did not exhibit seasonal differences in immune response.

Conclusions:

  • Infant PCV13 vaccination during the RVS leads to a blunted immune response, particularly for the initial dose.
  • Higher carrier-load vaccines like PCV13 may be more susceptible to respiratory viral-mediated immune interference.
  • PCV7 responses were not affected, suggesting a differential impact based on vaccine valency.
Abstract