Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Blinding01:11

Blinding

2.4K
Blinding is a commonly used method of not telling participants which treatment a subject is receiving. Blinding is a critical part of a randomized control trial or RCT. It reduces the bias that affects the results. In an RCT, blinding is used in the form of a placebo. A placebo effect occurs when untreated subjects falsely believe they have received the treatment and report improved symptoms. A placebo or a dummy treatment is administered to subjects to negate the bias caused by such an effect.
2.4K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

120
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
120
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

87
The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
87
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Right ventricular dysfunction: an overlooked predictor of sudden cardiac death and arrhythmic events-a meta-analysis.

Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society·2026
Same author

Vocal Health of Pastors in the Protestant Church in Germany.

Journal of voice : official journal of the Voice Foundation·2026
Same author

The present and the future of risk stratification for and prevention of sudden cardiac death: A Heart Rhythm Society think tank meeting.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Ventricular Fibrillation Without Hemodynamic Deterioration: An Electrocardiographic Paradox Explained by Heterotopic Heart Transplantation.

JACC. Case reports·2026
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of catheter ablation in end-stage heart failure with atrial fibrillation: Insights from CASTLE-HTx.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

Effect of RYGB Limb Lengths on HbA1c in Patients with Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes.

Obesity surgery·2026
Same journal

Prehabilitation in lung cancer patients undergoing lung resection surgery (Fit4LungNeo): study protocol.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Orforglipron for the treatment of moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea in adults with obesity or overweight: Study design and baseline characteristics of ATTAIN-OSA, a phase 3 trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Implementation science and the clinical trial workforce: A national needs assessment of training and practice.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Understanding recruitment challenges in Swiss oncology trials: Patient voices from focus groups.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

Effectiveness of couple-based maternity education on husbands' involvement in maternity continuum of care service utilization in rural communities of Central Ethiopia: Protocol of cluster randomized controlled trial.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
Same journal

The design of a small Bayesian hybrid-controlled trial utilizing time-to-event data from six published sources that used best alternative care to treat liver-predominant metastasis from primary ocular melanoma.

Contemporary clinical trials communications·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K

A simple blinding index for randomized controlled trials.

David Petroff1, Miroslav Bacak1, Nikolaos Dagres2

  • 1Clinical Trial Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Germany.

Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
|December 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Assessing the quality of blinding in randomized controlled trials is crucial. This study introduces a novel method and R-package to overcome the limitations of existing blinding assessment tools, improving trial integrity.

Keywords:
BlindingBlinding indexRandomized controlled trialStatistical testWilson score method

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

431
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

14.4K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

431
Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health
06:13

Author Spotlight: Exploring the Impact of Reduced Resistance Exercise Volume on Metabolic Health

Published on: December 1, 2023

1.0K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Statistical Analysis in Research
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Blinding is a critical component in maintaining the integrity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
  • Current methods for assessing the quality of blinding, such as the James index and Bang index, have significant limitations.
  • The lack of robust quality checks for blinding can compromise the internal validity of trial results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the existing indices used for measuring blinding quality in RCTs.
  • To propose a novel, more advantageous method for assessing the quality of blinding.
  • To provide practical tools for implementing the proposed blinding assessment method.

Main Methods:

  • A critical review and conceptual analysis of the James and Bang indices for blinding assessment.
  • Development of a new statistical approach for quantifying the quality of blinding in clinical trials.
  • Creation of an R-package to facilitate the computation of the proposed blinding index.

Main Results:

  • The James and Bang indices exhibit considerable weaknesses and limitations in accurately reflecting blinding quality.
  • The proposed alternative method offers a more reliable and advantageous approach to measuring blinding.
  • An R-package is available for the practical application of the new blinding index.

Conclusions:

  • Existing methods for assessing blinding in RCTs are inadequate.
  • The newly proposed method and accompanying R-package provide a superior tool for evaluating blinding quality.
  • Implementing this new approach can enhance the rigor and reliability of randomized controlled trials.