Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

07:27
Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
Published on: February 7, 2025
418
Robot-assisted microsurgery: a single-center experience of 100 cases
F Struebing1, A Boecker1, F Vollbach1,2
1Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Hand and Plastic Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Heidelberg University, Ludwig Guttmann-Straße 13, 67071, Ludwigshafen, Germany.
Journal of Robotic Surgery
|December 17, 2024
Summary
Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) using the Symani Surgical System shows promise in complex procedures like free flaps and nerve surgery. This study of 100 cases demonstrates a viable alternative to traditional microsurgery with a good safety profile.
Area of Science:
- Microsurgery
- Robotic Surgery
- Surgical Technology
Background:
- Robot-assisted microsurgery (RAMS) represents an advancement in microsurgical techniques.
- The Symani Surgical System offers tremor elimination, motion scaling, and improved ergonomics.
- Recent CE and FDA approvals highlight the system's growing acceptance.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report on the first 100 consecutive cases of RAMS at a high-volume academic center.
- To assess the clinical application and efficacy of RAMS.
- To evaluate the safety profile and outcomes of RAMS in diverse microsurgical procedures.
Main Methods:
- A prospective database collected data on 100 consecutive RAMS cases between February 2023 and April 2024.
- Data included patient demographics, surgical details, and outcomes.
- Surgeons underwent a 12-hour training program prior to system use.
Main Results:
- RAMS was performed in 100 patients (mean age 54 years, 66% male), primarily for free flaps (73%), nerve surgery (20%), and lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) (6%).
- 159 anastomoses were performed with a 12% major complication rate; 2.7% of free flaps were lost completely, and 1.4% partially.
- LVAs showed significantly longer times per stitch (p<0.01). Conversion rate to conventional techniques was 3%.
Conclusions:
- RAMS is a feasible and viable alternative to traditional microsurgery in a high-volume setting.
- The system demonstrates a commendable safety profile, with complication rates comparable to existing literature.
- Challenges include longer anastomosis times and higher costs, but overall efficacy is affirmed.

