Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.6K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.6K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

26.2K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
26.2K
Group Design02:01

Group Design

8.9K
The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between...
8.9K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

6.7K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
6.7K
Social Scripts02:10

Social Scripts

9.4K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
9.4K
Conformity01:20

Conformity

45.0K
Conformity is the change in a person’s behavior to go along with the group, even if that person does not agree with the group.
45.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Fecundity-Longevity Trade-Off in a Clonal Eusocial Insect: In Isolation, Subordinate Workers Match Dominants in Reproduction.

The American naturalist·2026
Same author

Colony identity: How ants gain - and lose - tolerance towards strangers.

Current biology : CB·2026
Same author

Blade-running: an efficient yet simple behaviour to potentially combat summit disease in ants.

BMC ecology and evolution·2026
Same author

Non-lethal fungal infection could reduce aggression towards strangers in ants.

Communications biology·2023
Same author

Resource sharing is sufficient for the emergence of division of labour.

Nature communications·2022
Same author

Absence of genetic isolation across highly fragmented landscape in the ant Temnothorax nigriceps.

BMC ecology and evolution·2022

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.1K

Randomness as a driver of inactivity in social groups.

Abel Bernadou1, Raphaël Jeanson1

  • 1Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, France.

Plos Computational Biology
|December 17, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Many social insect colonies keep a fraction of workers idle. This study suggests that worker inactivity can be beneficial, allowing colonies to select the most efficient individuals for tasks.

More Related Videos

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K
Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster
08:04

Conditions Affecting Social Space in Drosophila melanogaster

Published on: November 5, 2015

12.1K
A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats
06:17

A Task for Assessing the Impact of a Partner on the Speed and Accuracy of Motor Performance in Rats

Published on: October 17, 2019

4.9K
Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

13.8K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology

Background:

  • Social insects exhibit remarkable colony organization and division of labor, crucial for their ecological success.
  • Despite high efficiency, many insect societies display significant worker inactivity, a phenomenon lacking a consensus explanation.
  • Task specialization in social insects leverages inter-individual variations, often genetically influenced, affecting task performance efficiency.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To test the hypothesis that social insect colonies generate excess workers to recruit only the most efficient performers.
  • To explore the conditions under which worker inactivity is evolutionarily advantageous.
  • To investigate the role of production, maintenance, and activity costs in sustaining inactive worker fractions.

Main Methods:

  • Developed a mathematical model to simulate worker production, maintenance, and activity costs.
  • Incorporated variations in individual worker efficiency using different random distributions.
  • Analyzed model outcomes to determine the conditions favoring worker inactivity.

Main Results:

  • Worker inactivity can be beneficial across a wide range of parameters, particularly when it facilitates the selection of highly efficient workers.
  • The model supports the idea that generating a surplus of individuals allows colonies to optimize task performance.
  • Inactive workers may be a byproduct of random individual generation in decentralized systems.

Conclusions:

  • Worker inactivity in social insects can be an adaptive strategy, enabling the recruitment of the most efficient individuals.
  • The generation of a variable workforce, including inactive members, is a viable strategy for optimizing colony function.
  • Random processes in generating individuals with uncontrollable performance levels may lead to inactivity as a byproduct.