Selected possibilities of physical medicine versus cancer diseases

Aims: This review aims to synthesize the latest literature on physical treatments for wounds, focusing on the use of ozone therapy, topical oxygen therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, and red light therapy in oncology patients. It evaluates the indications, benefits, and contraindications of these therapies, especially concerning cancer..

Materials and Methods: A literature search was conducted in publicly available online databases, covering publications in English and Polish from 2010 to 2024. The inclusion criteria comprised clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and review articles on physical treatments for wounds in oncology patients. The selection process involved pre-selection, title and abstract review, and full-text review to ensure compliance with the inclusion criteria. Data were analyzed to identify mechanisms of action, therapeutic efficacy, and potential risks associated with these therapies in oncology patients. Ozone therapy showed potential in reducing bacterial load and tumor hypoxia, enhancing chemotherapy efficacy. Topical oxygen therapy was effective for chronic wounds, with careful application near tumor sites. Pulsed electromagnetic field therapy demonstrated promising anticancer effects, inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. Red light therapy, while beneficial for managing side effects of cancer treatments, was contraindicated in areas with active tumors due to the risk of stimulating cancer cell proliferation.

Conclusions: Physical therapies offer benefits in wound management but require careful consideration in oncology patients. Personalized evaluation and further research are essential to establish safe and effective protocols for oncology patients, maximizing therapeutic benefits while minimizing risks.