Synchronization transitions in adaptive simplicial complexes with cooperative and competitive dynamics
S Nirmala Jenifer1, Dibakar Ghosh2, Paulsamy Muruganandam1
1Department of Physics, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli 620024, Tamil Nadu, India.
Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.)
|December 17, 2024
Summary
This study introduces a new adaptive network model that includes higher-order interactions and diverse adaptation types. The research reveals how these factors influence synchronization transitions in complex systems like the brain and social networks.
Area of Science:
- Complex systems
- Network science
- Statistical physics
Background:
- Current adaptive network models often overlook higher-order interactions and varied adaptation types (cooperative/competitive).
- These neglected factors are crucial in real-world systems like the human brain and social networks.
- Understanding these dynamics is key to explaining collective behaviors such as synchronization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop an adaptive network model incorporating higher-order interactions and both cooperative and competitive adaptations.
- To investigate the impact of these combined factors on collective properties, particularly synchronization phase transitions.
- To explore how network structure and adaptation types dictate the manner and timing of synchronization.
Main Methods:
- Development of a simplified adaptive network model.
- Analysis of phase transitions, focusing on synchronization phenomena.
- Investigation of the influence of higher-order interactions and coupling strengths on system dynamics.
- Examination of systems with only competitive adaptations versus those with combined cooperative and competitive adaptations.
Main Results:
- Higher-order interactions can shift synchronization from first-order to second-order under competitive adaptation.
- Synchronization is possible even without pairwise interactions if higher-order coupling is sufficiently strong.
- Competitive adaptations lead to second-order-like phase transitions and clustering.
- Combined cooperative and competitive adaptations result in a first-order-like phase transition with hysteresis.
Conclusions:
- The model successfully captures complex synchronization dynamics influenced by higher-order interactions and diverse adaptation types.
- The findings demonstrate that network structure and adaptation mechanisms can be tuned to control synchronization onset and behavior.
- This work provides a more comprehensive framework for understanding collective phenomena in adaptive systems.
Related Concept Videos
Cooperative Allosteric Transitions
7.8K
Cooperative allosteric transitions can occur in multimeric proteins, where each subunit of the protein has its own ligand-binding site. When a ligand binds to any of these subunits, it triggers a conformational change that affects the binding sites in the other subunits; this can change the affinity of the other sites for their respective ligands. The ability of the protein to change the shape of its binding site is attributed to the presence of a mix of flexible and stable segments in the...
7.8K
BIBO stability of continuous and discrete -time systems
337
System stability is a fundamental concept in signal processing, often assessed using convolution. For a system to be considered bounded-input bounded-output (BIBO) stable, any bounded input signal must produce a bounded output signal. A bounded input signal is one where the modulus does not exceed a certain constant at any point in time.
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
To determine the BIBO stability, the convolution integral is utilized when a bounded continuous-time input is applied to a Linear Time-Invariant (LTI) system....
337
Adaptability of Cytoskeletal Filaments
3.7K
The cytoskeleton is a complex dynamic structure performing varied functions based on cellular requirements. The adaptability of the individual filaments in the cytoskeleton determines their ability to perform various functions within the cell. It can undergo rapid reorganization during processes like cell division or remain stable for several hours as in the interphase. The adaptability of these filaments depends on stringent regulatory mechanisms. The microfilament and microtubules of the...
3.7K
Lattice Centering and Coordination Number
9.5K
The structure of a crystalline solid, whether a metal or not, is best described by considering its simplest repeating unit, which is referred to as its unit cell. The unit cell consists of lattice points that represent the locations of atoms or ions. The entire structure then consists of this unit cell repeating in three dimensions. The three different types of unit cells present in the cubic lattice are illustrated in Figure 1.
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
Types of Unit Cells
Imagine taking a large number of identical...
9.5K
Simplified Synchronous Machine Model
181
The Synchronous Machine Model is a fundamental tool in analyzing and ensuring the transient stability of power systems. This model simplifies the representation of a synchronous machine under balanced three-phase positive-sequence conditions, assuming constant excitation and ignoring losses and saturation. The model is pivotal for understanding the behavior of synchronous generators connected to a power grid, particularly during transient events.
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
In this model, each generator is connected to a...
181
Ladder Diagrams: Complexation Equilibria
320
Ladder diagrams are useful for evaluating equilibria involving metal-ligand complexes. The vertical scale of the ladder diagram represents the concentration of unreacted or free ligand, pL. The horizontal lines on the scale depict the log of stepwise formation constants for metal-ligand complexes and indicate the dominant species in all the regions.
The formation constant, K1, for the formation of Cd(NH3)2+ complex from cadmium and ammonia is 3.55 × 102. Log K1 (i.e. pNH3) is 2.55, and...
The formation constant, K1, for the formation of Cd(NH3)2+ complex from cadmium and ammonia is 3.55 × 102. Log K1 (i.e. pNH3) is 2.55, and...
320


