FGFR-Altered Urothelial Carcinoma: Resistance Mechanisms and Therapeutic Strategies
David J Benjamin1, Alain C Mita2
1Hoag Family Cancer Institute, 1 Hoag Drive, Building 41, Newport Beach, CA, 92663, USA. David.Benjamin@hoag.org.
Abstract:
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2/3 alterations have been implicated in tumorigenesis in several malignancies, including urothelial carcinoma. Several FGFR inhibitors have been studied or are in development, and erdafitinib is the sole inhibitor to achieve regulatory approval. Given the rapidly evolving treatment landscape for advanced urothelial carcinoma, including regulatory approvals and withdrawals, determining the most appropriate treatment strategies and sequencing for FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma is becoming increasing critical. However, the clinical efficacy of FGFR inhibitors is limited by acquired resistance similar to that seen with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Additional challenges to the clinical use of FGFR inhibitors include treatment-related adverse events and the financial costs associated with treatment. In this review, we describe known mechanisms of FGFR inhibitor resistance, including gatekeeper mutations, domain mutations, and the development of new mutations. In addition, we discuss management strategies, including ongoing clinical trials evaluating FGFR inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and combination therapies with immune checkpoint inhibitors that may provide additional treatment options for localized and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
Insights
Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations drive cancer, but FGFR inhibitors face resistance and side effects. This review explores resistance mechanisms and new treatments for FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2/3 alterations are implicated in urothelial carcinoma tumorigenesis.
- Erdafitinib is the only approved FGFR inhibitor, but treatment landscapes are rapidly changing.
- Acquired resistance, adverse events, and cost limit FGFR inhibitor efficacy.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review mechanisms of FGFR inhibitor resistance in urothelial carcinoma.
- To discuss current and emerging treatment strategies for FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of FGFR inhibitor resistance mechanisms.
- Analysis of clinical trials and therapeutic approaches for FGFR-altered urothelial carcinoma.
Main Results:
- Known resistance mechanisms include gatekeeper mutations, domain mutations, and new mutations.
- Ongoing trials investigate FGFR inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, and combination therapies.
- Management strategies aim to overcome resistance and improve patient outcomes.
Conclusions:
- Understanding FGFR inhibitor resistance is crucial for optimizing treatment sequencing.
- Emerging therapies offer potential for improved outcomes in localized and metastatic urothelial carcinoma.
- Combination therapies and antibody-drug conjugates show promise in addressing treatment challenges.
More Related Videos
09:38Establishing Dual Resistance to EGFR-TKI and MET-TKI in Lung Adenocarcinoma Cells In Vitro with a 2-step Dose-escalation Procedure
Published on: August 11, 2017
08:46Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Mitogens and the Cell Cycle
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
