Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
Published on: September 16, 2022
Cross validation in stochastic analytic continuation
Gabe Schumm1, Sibin Yang1, Anders W Sandvik1
1Department of Physics, <a href="https://ror.org/05qwgg493">Boston University</a>, 590 Commonwealth Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, USA.
Abstract:
Stochastic analytic continuation (SAC) of quantum Monte Carlo (QMC) imaginary-time correlation function data is a valuable tool in connecting many-body models to experimentally measurable dynamic response functions. Recent developments of the SAC method have allowed for spectral functions with sharp features, e.g., narrow peaks and divergent edges, to be resolved with unprecedented fidelity. Often it is not known what exact sharp features, if any, are present a priori, and, due to the ill-posed nature of the analytic continuation problem, multiple spectral representations may be acceptable. In this work we borrow from the machine learning and statistics literature and implement a cross validation technique to provide an unbiased method to identify the most likely spectrum among a set obtained with different spectral parametrizations and imposed constraints. We demonstrate the power of this method with examples using imaginary-time data generated by QMC simulations and synthetic data generated from artificial spectra. Our procedure, which can be considered a form of model selection, can be applied to a variety of numerical analytic continuation methods, beyond just SAC.
Related Concept Videos
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error
Divergence and Stokes' Theorems
One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation
On...
Parametric Survival Analysis: Weibull and Exponential Methods
Weibull Distribution
The Weibull distribution is a flexible model used in parametric survival analysis. It can handle both increasing and decreasing hazard rates, depending on its shape parameter...
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

