Related Experiment Video For Amide proton transfer–weighted imaging
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance APT and DKI imaging for breast cancer
Haiyan Shan1, Tengfei Ke2, Shasha Bao1
1Department of Radiology, Yan 'an Hospital Affiliated to Kunming Medical University, Yan 'an Hospital of Kunming City, Kunming, China.
Objective:
This study aimed to compare the performance of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, evaluate molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and determine the diagnostic efficacy of the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) parameters in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases.
Methods:
The study included 168 women who underwent breast APTWI and DKI at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between December 2022 and July 2023. The APT signal intensity (SI), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured before surgery. The differences in the aforementioned qMRI parameters in molecular subtypes of breast cancer were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. The efficacy of each quantitative parameter in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases was evaluated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve.
Results:
Significant differences in qMRI parameters were noted between benign and malignant breast lesions. The Kapp (P < .0001) and APT (P < .05) values were higher for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. Conversely, the ADC (P < .0001) and Dapp (P < .0001) values were lower for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for various parameter combinations. The AUC of Kapp was 0.871, Dapp was 0.872, APT SI was 0.643, DKI + APT was 0.893, DKI + ADC was 0.936, APT + ADC was 0.925, and DKI + APT + ADC was 0.933. Additionally, ADC values (P = .01) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to Kapp (P = .03), Dapp (P = .03), and APT values (P = .06) in distinguishing between different molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
Conclusions:
APTWI distinguished benign from malignant breast disease and enhanced the utility of diffusion-weighted MRI. However, it was not superior to DKI and DWI in identifying the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
More Related Videos
06:24Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging of an Orthotopic Pancreatic Cancer Mouse Model
Published on: April 18, 2015
12:23Multi-modal Imaging of Angiogenesis in a Nude Rat Model of Breast Cancer Bone Metastasis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volumetric Computed Tomography and Ultrasound
Published on: August 14, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Brain Imaging
These technologies include computerized axial tomography (CAT or CT scans), positron-emission tomography (PET scans), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and Transcranial Magnetic...