Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 23, 2026
Rat Model of Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
Published on: September 28, 2018
Comparative study of open elbow arthrolysis with and without hinge external fixation for the treatment of
Changhao Yang1, Jinye Dong2, Fanxiao Liu1
1Department of Orthopedics Surgery, Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, 324 Jing Wu Road, Jinan, 250021, China.
Background:
The present study aimed to compare the functional outcomes of hinged external fixators and non-external fixation in open elbow arthrolysis (OEA) for post-traumatic elbow stiffness (PTES) and to evaluate their applicability and limitations in patients with posttraumatic elbow stiffness.
Methods:
The clinical data of patients with PTES treated with OEA at our hospital between March 2015 and June 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The assessed variables were the operation time, intraoperative blood loss volume, duration of hospitalization, and treatment costs. The elbow range of motion (ROM), Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS), shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (Q-DASH) score, Oxford Elbow score (OES), Broberg and Morrey score (BMS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, and complications such as pin tract infection and heterotopic ossification were compared between patients with and without hinge external fixation. We also compared the baseline characteristics and functional outcomes of patients with and without hinge external fixation.
Results:
A total of 156 patients (48 patients with hinged external fixators and 108 patients without external fixators) diagnosed with PTES were included in this study. The mean follow-up was 15.8 ± 3.6 months. Compared with patients without external fixators, those with external fixators showed significantly greater improvements in elbow flexion and extension ROM (59.6° ± 26.1° vs. 46.2° ± 26.2°, p = 0.004) but had a significantly longer duration of hospitalization (p < 0.001), significantly longer operation time (p < 0.001), significantly higher treatment costs (p < 0.001), and significantly greater intraoperative blood loss volume (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of improvement in elbow rotation ROM, MEPS score, VAS score for pain, OES score, Q-DASH score, BMS score, or incidence of complications.
Conclusion:
The use of a hinged external fixator in open arthrolysis for posttraumatic elbow stiffness may result in short-term improvements in flexion-extension range of motion but is accompanied by increased blood loss, longer operative time, extended hospitalization, and higher costs. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
Clinical Trial Number:
Not applicable.
