A physiotherapist-led biopsychosocial education and exercise programme for patients with chronic low back pain in
Paapa Kwesi Ampiah1, Paul Hendrick2, Fiona Moffatt2
1Division of Physiotherapy, Department of Health Sciences, College of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Brunel University of London, London, UK. PaapaKwesi.Ampiah@brunel.ac.uk.
Background:
Low back pain is a common musculoskeletal condition which causes substantial disability globally. The biopsychosocial model of management has been recommended in national and international guidelines for the management of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). However, biopsychosocial approaches are predominantly delivered in high income countries (HICs), although the prevalence of LBP is substantially higher in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) especially in Africa (39%; 95% CI 30-47). Understanding the effectiveness of BPS interventions in LMICs especially in Africa is underexplored, with substantial inequity between research from HICs and LMICs. Ghana is a LMIC where the effectiveness of biopsychosocial interventions has been underexplored. Therefore, the aim of this study was to explore the feasibility of delivering a physiotherapist-led BPS programme for the management of patients with CLBP in Ghana.
Methods:
This was a mixed-methods, sequential, pretest-posttest feasibility study. Participants involved thirty patients with CLBP. The biopsychosocial intervention involved an exercise and patient education programme based on principles of cognitive behavioural strategies with emphasis on self-management. The biopsychosocial intervention was delivered for six weeks for each participant. Feasibility outcomes regarding management and processes were captured pre-intervention, post-intervention, and three-months post intervention. Semi-structured interviews were conducted post-intervention to explore participants' experiences with the biopsychosocial intervention. Patients' demographics were collected at baseline. Patient reported outcome measures such as intensity of pain, disability, pain catastrophising, kinesiophobia, self-efficacy, and general quality of life, were collected pre-intervention, post-intervention and at three-months follow-up. Qualitative analysis explored participants' experiences regarding the acceptability of the biopsychosocial intervention.
Results:
The results of this feasibility study demonstrated that the training programme was acceptable to physiotherapists. Recruitment rate (5 patient participants per week - 100% recruitment met), retention rate post-intervention (90%), data completion rate post-intervention (99.8%) and intervention fidelity (83.1%), all met feasibility thresholds. There were no adverse events. Qualitative data also demonstrated that the biopsychosocial intervention was acceptable to participants.
Conclusion:
This study has established the potential to deliver a biopsychosocial intervention programme in a Ghanaian hospital setting. This biopsychosocial intervention therefore shows promise, and the result of the study provides a platform to develop future clinical studies.
