Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Pseudotype Virus System for Assessing Omicron Subvariants and Neutralizing Antibodies in SARS-CoV-2 Research
Published on: September 8, 2023
The Impact of SARS-CoV-2 on Work Absence: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Vaccinated and Unvaccinated Workers
Dominic Etli1, Antonina Wiewior, Alex Malone
1From the Mission Support and Test Services, Las Vegas, Nevada.
Objective:
The aim of the study was to compare SARS-CoV-2 infection and work absence rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated employees during a 2-year pandemic period.
Methods:
This is a cross-sectional study with 2107 participants. Primary outcomes were as follows: total days missed; and main exposure: vaccination status. Analyses included t tests to compare absence days and analysis of variance to evaluate confounders. Mixed-effects logistic regression assessed infection risk, incorporating community prevalence as a fixed effect and work location as a random effect.
Results:
Vaccinated employees missed slightly fewer days (0.16 days), though not statistically significant ( P = 0.574). Symptom severity and job status were linked to higher absenteeism. Vaccination had a small but significant protective effect ( P = 0.045). Remote work correlated moderately with reduced absenteeism.
Conclusions:
Vaccination lowered infection risk but not absenteeism due to uniform quarantine policies. Remote work reduced absenteeism and should be integrated into future interventions to support vulnerable workers.
Related Concept Videos
Vaccinations
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Contingency Table
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Quantifying Work

