Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Prediction Error-driven Retrieval Procedure for Destabilizing and Rewriting Maladaptive Reward Memories in Hazardous Drinkers
Published on: January 5, 2018
Combining Motivational Interviewing and Cognitive Bias Modification Training for Substances in Detained Youth
Hans S van der Baan1, Annematt L Collot D'Escury-Koenigs1,2, Raoul P P P Grasman1
1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
This study found that a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) intervention did not increase motivation for treatment in detained youth. The intervention, combined with Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM), showed no significant effects on motivation or substance use reduction.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Adolescent Psychiatry
- Forensic Psychology
Background:
- Detained youth often exhibit low motivation for treatment and behavioral change, hindering successful interventions.
- Substance use is a significant issue among detained populations, necessitating effective therapeutic approaches.
- Motivational Interviewing (MI) and Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) are interventions explored for enhancing treatment engagement and reducing substance use.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the feasibility and effects of a brief Motivational Interviewing (MI) protocol combined with Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) on detained youth.
- To assess the impact of this combined intervention on motivation for treatment and behavioral change in a juvenile detention setting.
- To adapt an existing MI protocol for adult parolees to suit the adolescent population in detention.
Main Methods:
- A pilot study involving 52 detained youth who received the adapted MI protocol alongside CBM.
- A control group received CBM without the MI intervention, matched for similar population characteristics.
- Repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to examine changes in motivation over time and between conditions.
Main Results:
- The study found no significant changes in motivation over time within the intervention group.
- There was no significant difference in motivation between the group receiving MI plus CBM and the control group receiving only CBM.
- The application of the MI protocol was deemed feasible in this population.
Conclusions:
- The adapted MI protocol, when combined with CBM, did not demonstrate an effect on motivation for treatment in detained youth.
- Adaptations to the MI protocol may be necessary, as certain components, like reflection on extensive substance use history, might not be applicable to adolescents with briefer use patterns.
- Future interventions should consider the severity of substance use behavior in detained youth when designing or applying therapeutic protocols.
Related Concept Videos
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Cognitive Therapy
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

