Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

A Bioluminescent and Fluorescent Orthotopic Syngeneic Murine Model of Androgen-dependent and Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer
Published on: March 6, 2018
Landscape and prognostic significance of oncogene drivers in metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer
Theodore Wang1, Jongmyung Kim1, Ritesh Kumar1
1Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Background:
Tumor suppressors are well known drivers of cancer invasion and metastasis in metastatic castration sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). However, oncogenes are also known to be altered in this state, however the frequency and prognosis of these alterations are unclear. Thus, we aimed to study the spectrum of oncogene mutations in mCSPC and study the significance of these alteration on outcomes.
Methods:
Four hundred and seventy-seven patients with mCSPC were included who underwent next generation sequencing. Oncogene alterations were defined as mutations in ALK, AKT1-3, BRAF, CCND1-3, CTNNB1, EGFR, ERBB2, FGFR1, FGFR2, HRAS, KRAS, MDM2, MET, MITF, MYC, NOTCH1-3, NRAS, PIK3CA, PI3KCB, PIK3R1, RET. Endpoints of interests were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), time to development of CRPC (tdCRPC), and overall survival (OS). Kaplan Meier analysis was performed and Cox regression hazard ratios (HR) calculated.
Results:
A total of 477 patients were included with baseline characteristics with 117 patients (24.5%) harbored a mutation within an oncogene. A total of 172 oncogene mutations were found within the population with the most common being MYC (n=29; 16.9%), PIK3CA (n=24; 14%), CTNNB1 (n=22, 12.8%), BRAF (n=10, 5.8%), and CCND1 (n=10, 5.8%). Oncogene mutations were associated with inferior rPFS (19.2 vs. 32.2 months, P=0.03), tdCRPC (15.7 vs. 32.4 months, P<0.001), and OS (5-year OS 75.3% vs. 55.4%, P=0.01). On multivariable analysis oncogene mutations were strongly associated with tdCRPC (HR 1.42, P=0.03).
Conclusions:
Oncogenes are frequency mutated in mCSPC and associated with aggressive features and inferior outcomes. Future work will need to validate these results to better assess its significance in allowing for personalization of care.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer-Critical Genes I: Proto-oncogenes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...

