Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Assessing the Difficulty and Long-Term Retention of Factual and Conceptual Knowledge Through Multiple-Choice
Neil G Haycocks1,2, Jessica Hernandez-Moreno3, Johan C Bester4
1Department of Pathology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Purpose:
Multiple choice questions (MCQs) are the mainstay in examinations for medical education, physician licensing, and board certification. Traditionally, MCQs tend to test rote recall of memorized facts. Their utility in assessing higher cognitive functions has been more problematic to determine. This work evaluates and compares the difficulty and long-term retention of factual versus conceptual knowledge using multiple-choice questions in a longitudinal study.
Patients And Methods:
We classified a series of MCQs into two groups to test recall/verbatim and conceptual/inferential thinking, respectively. We used the MCQs to test a two-part hypothesis: 1) scores for recall/verbatim questions would be significantly higher than for concept/inference questions, and 2) memory loss over time would be more significant for factual knowledge than conceptual understanding compared with a loss in the ability to reason about concepts critically. We first used the MCQs with pre-clinical medical students on a summative exam in 2020, which served as a retrospective benchmark of their performance characteristics. After two years, the same questions were re-administered to volunteers from the same cohort of students in 2020.
Results:
Retrospective analysis revealed that recall/verbatim questions were answered correctly more frequently (82.0% vs 60.9%, P = 0.002). Performance on concept/inference questions showed a significant decline, but a larger decline was observed for recall/verbatim questions after two years. Performance on concept/inference questions showed a slight decline across quartiles, while two years later, recall/verbatim questions experienced substantial performance loss. Subgroup analysis indicated convergence in performance on both question types, suggesting that the clinical relevance of the MCQ content may have influenced a regression toward a baseline mean.
Conclusion:
These findings suggest conceptual/inferential thinking is more complex than rote memorization. However, the knowledge acquired is more durable in a longitudinal fashion, especially if it is reinforced in clinical settings.
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
Understanding Memory
Long-Term Memory
Long-term memory can be categorized into two primary types: explicit and implicit memory. Explicit memory, also known as declarative memory, involves the conscious recollection of information that we deliberately try to remember, recall, and articulate. This type of memory encompasses specific facts, events, and...
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Retrieval
Recall involves accessing information without cues, such as during an essay test, where individuals must retrieve facts and concepts from memory unaided. Another example is remembering the name of a colleague...
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...

