Evaluating and Improving Surgical Site Infection Prevention: Outcomes of a Two-Cycle Audit and Targeted Interventions...

Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections (HAIs), leading to significant morbidity, mortality, and increased healthcare costs. Despite the existence of international guidelines, adherence to best practices remains inconsistent, particularly in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).  Objective The objectives of this study are to evaluate compliance with SSI prevention guidelines among medical professionals at Kasr El Ainy Teaching Hospital in Cairo, Egypt, identify gaps in practice and knowledge, and implement targeted interventions to improve outcomes.  Methods A prospective two-cycle audit was conducted over a period of eight months involving 225 elective surgical patients and 229 healthcare providers. Questionnaires were distributed to foundation year (FY) doctors and surgical residents to assess their knowledge and practices related to SSI prevention across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative phases. Patients were followed up to monitor the incidence of SSIs. Interventions implemented included educational sessions, dissemination of posters, and hands-on training to enhance adherence to best practices. Results The initial audit revealed an SSI rate of 12.6% and significant gaps in guidelines knowledge, including improper preoperative hair removal methods and prolonged postoperative antibiotic use (85.7%). Post-intervention, SSI rates decreased to 6.6%, with the questionnaire results showing marked improvements in understanding of key components in SSI prevention: 100% became aware of appropriate intraoperative surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) (compared to 72.3%), a significant increase (p < 0.05) in the use of clippers (rather than razors) for hair removal (72.1% vs. 33.7%) and intraoperative (rather than preoperative) hair removal (91.8% vs. 10%) (p < 0.05), as well as the need for intraoperative warming practices (87.7% vs. 47.7%) (p < 0.05). Knowledge and adherence to aseptic techniques improved across all staff groups, with awareness increasing from 36.3% to 81.9% among junior doctors, representing a significant improvement (p < 0.05). Conclusion Targeted interventions, including education and practice standardization, significantly reduced SSI rates and improved compliance with prevention guidelines. These findings highlight the value of structured audits and educational programs in enhancing surgical outcomes and reducing the burden of SSI, particularly in resource-limited settings.