Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 17, 2011
Planning a Phased Guideline Implementation Strategy Across the Multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids
Jeremy M Loberger1, Kristine R Hearld2, Akira Nishisaki3
1Division of Pediatric Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Insights
This study identified three tiers for implementing pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines, prioritizing easier interventions first. Tailoring strategies by unit and role is recommended for successful guideline adoption.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Implementation Science
- Respiratory Therapy
Background:
- Pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Implementing these guidelines across diverse clinical settings presents challenges.
- A structured approach is needed to facilitate guideline adoption.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess contextual factors influencing the implementation of pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines.
- To develop a phased implementation strategy for a multicenter collaborative.
Main Methods:
- A cross-sectional qualitative analysis of a 2023/2024 survey.
- Data collected from physicians, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and nurses in the international, multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) collaborative.
- Analysis of 409 responses from 26 PICUs across 18 centers.
Main Results:
- Three implementation tiers (A, B, C) were identified based on evidence, feasibility, impact, and favorability perceptions.
- Tier A (≥80% agreement) included extubation readiness testing (ERT) screening, ERT bundle, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), upper airway obstruction (UAO) risk mitigation, and risk-stratified noninvasive respiratory support (NRS).
- Perceived practice gaps were smallest in Tier A (e.g., risk-stratified NRS at 88% agreement) and largest in Tier C (e.g., respiratory muscle strength at 18% agreement). Significant differences in perceptions were noted based on role and unit type.
Conclusions:
- The study provides a foundation for phased implementation of 2023 pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines.
- Early implementation phases should focus on Tier A interventions with the smallest practice gaps.
- Later phases should address more challenging recommendations, considering unit- and role-based tailoring.
Objectives:
To evaluate contextual factors relevant to implementing pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines and to develop an implementation strategy for a multicenter collaborative.
Design:
Cross-sectional qualitative analysis of a 2023/2024 survey.
Setting:
International, multicenter Ventilation Liberation for Kids (VentLib4Kids) collaborative.
Subjects:
Physicians, advanced practice providers, respiratory therapists, and nurses.
Interventions:
None.
Measurements And Main Results:
The survey was distributed to 26 PICUs representing 18 unique centers (17 in North American)-14 general medical/surgical, eight cardiac, and four mixed (1935 solicitations). All 409 responses were analyzed (prescribers 39.8%, nursing 32.8%, and respiratory therapists 27.4%). Three implementation tiers were identified based on perceptions of evidence, feasibility, positive impact, and favorability constructs. Tier A (≥ 80% agreement for all constructs) included extubation readiness testing (ERT) screening, ERT bundle, spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs), upper airway obstruction (UAO) risk mitigation, and risk stratified noninvasive respiratory support (NRS). Tier B (50-79% agreement) included standard risk SBT method, risk stratified SBT duration, and UAO risk assessment. Tier C (< 50% agreement) included high-risk SBT method, respiratory muscle strength testing, and infant NRS. The smallest perceived practice gaps were noted in tier A and the largest in tier C. The smallest practice gap was risk stratified NRS (88% agreement). The largest practice gap was respiratory muscle strength (18% agreement). In regression analysis, independently significant differences in perceptions based on role and unit type for multiple constructs were identified for UAO risk assessment, UAO risk mitigation, risk stratified NRS, and infant NRS.
Conclusions:
This survey study of the VentLib4Kids collaborative lays the foundation for phased implementation of the 2023 pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines. Early phases should focus on the best implementation profiles and smallest practice gaps. Later phases should address those that are more challenging. Unit- and role-based tailoring of differences should be considered for some recommendations more than others.
Related Concept Videos
Ventilatory Modes
There are three ventilatory modes: full support, partial support, and spontaneous. These are described below.
Full Support Modes
Full support modes include controlled mechanical ventilation, continuous mandatory...
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Oxygen Delivering System II: Venturi Mask and Transtracheal Oxygen
Venturi Mask
The Venturi mask, named after the Venturi effect, is designed to deliver precise oxygen concentrations. It consists of a large tube with an oxygen inlet that narrows down, causing a pressure drop that pulls air in through adjustable side ports. The mask is a lightweight,...

