Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Auditory Pathway01:15

Auditory Pathway

4.7K
Auditory pathways constitute the complex neural circuits responsible for transmitting and interpreting auditory information from the peripheral auditory system to the brain. Sound waves are initially captured by the outer ear, funneled through the ear canal, and reach the tympanic membrane (eardrum). These vibrations are transmitted via the middle ear's ossicles to the inner ear's cochlea.
When viewed cross-sectionally, the cochlea reveals the scala vestibuli and scala tympani flanking...
4.7K
Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

550
Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.
550
Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location01:21

Perceiving Loudness, Pitch, and Location

192
The human brain perceives pitch through two primary mechanisms reflected in place theory and frequency theory. Each mechanism describes how sound waves are interpreted as specific pitches by the brain, offering insights into the intricate processes of auditory perception.
Place theory, or place coding, suggests that different pitches are heard because various sound waves activate specific locations along the cochlea's basilar membrane. The brain determines the pitch of a sound by...
192

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Congruent audiovisual stimulation drives efficient guidance of attention by memory-irrelevant features.

Cognitive processing·2026
Same author

Impaired Exogenous Attentional Orienting to Gaze Cues in Children With ADHD: Evidence From Inhibition of Return.

Journal of attention disorders·2025
Same author

Feature-based attention enhances the binding between fine-grained features and responses.

Perception·2025
Same author

Altered multisensory integration in pilots: Examining susceptibility to fission and fusion sound-induced flash illusions.

i-Perception·2025
Same author

The inhibition of return is independent of attentional orienting both within and between modalities.

Cognitive processing·2025
Same author

Impaired emotional multimodal integration in inhibition of return in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

Cognitive processing·2024
Same journal

Molecular links between reelin downregulation, topoisomerase IIβ alterations, and proteins involved in Alzheimer pathology in human SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell line.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Motor cortex excitability during spine shape-judgment in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a TMS motor evoked potential study.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Trajectory dynamics and endpoint accuracy in targeted ballistic contractions.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Exploring Sevoflurane promotes hippocampal neuron mitophagy in elderly postoperative cognitive dysfunction by HSP90AA1 based on network pharmacology.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Loading modulates monosynaptic transmission from spindle primary afferents to motoneurons in humans.

Experimental brain research·2026
Same journal

Energy-dependent cortical injury thresholds in high-frequency transcortical electrical stimulation: a biophysical study in a rat model.

Experimental brain research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 11, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Cue modality modulates interaction between exogenous spatial attention and audiovisual integration.

Aijun Wang1, Hong Zhang2, Meihua Lu2

  • 1Department of Psychology, Research Center for Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Soochow University, Suzhou, People's Republic of China. ajwang@suda.edu.cn.

Experimental Brain Research
|December 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Exogenous spatial attention, triggered by visual or auditory cues, reduces audiovisual integration (AVI). Visual cues demonstrated a stronger attenuation effect on AVI compared to auditory cues in both facilitation and inhibition of return paradigms.

Keywords:
Audiovisual integrationCue-target paradigmExogenous spatial attentionFacilitation effectInhibition of return

More Related Videos

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 11, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
09:37

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control

Published on: July 5, 2015

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects
08:13

Using the Race Model Inequality to Quantify Behavioral Multisensory Integration Effects

Published on: May 10, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology
  • Sensory Integration

Background:

  • Exogenous spatial attention influences audiovisual integration (AVI).
  • Prior research explored inhibition of return (IOR) from visual cues and facilitation from auditory cues on AVI.
  • The differential impact of visual versus auditory exogenous spatial attention on AVI remained unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how exogenous spatial attention, cued by different modalities (visual, auditory), affects audiovisual integration (AVI).
  • To compare the effects of visual and auditory cues on AVI within facilitation and IOR paradigms.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized an exogenous spatial cue-target paradigm across two experiments.
  • Manipulated cue stimulus modality (visual vs. auditory) to induce spatial attention.
  • Measured the audiovisual integration (AVI) effect under valid and invalid cue conditions.

Main Results:

  • Both visual and auditory cues in the facilitation experiment (Experiment 1) significantly attenuated AVI, with visual cues showing a stronger effect.
  • In the IOR experiment (Experiment 2), visual cues attenuated AVI, but auditory cues did not significantly affect AVI.
  • Exogenous spatial attention induced by visual cues had a more pronounced effect on attenuating AVI than auditory cues.

Conclusions:

  • Exogenous spatial attention, regardless of modality, attenuates audiovisual integration.
  • Visual cues induce a stronger attenuation of AVI compared to auditory cues, both in facilitation and IOR effects.
  • These findings highlight modality-specific differences in how exogenous spatial attention modulates multisensory integration.