Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

What is Genetic Engineering?00:49

What is Genetic Engineering?

73.5K
Overview
73.5K
CRISPR01:59

CRISPR

49.3K
Genome editing technologies allow scientists to modify an organism’s DNA via the addition, removal, or rearrangement of genetic material at specific genomic locations. These types of techniques could potentially be used to cure genetic disorders such as hemophilia and sickle cell anemia. One popular and widely used DNA-editing research tool that could lead to safe and effective cures for genetic disorders is the CRISPR-Cas9 system. CRISPR-Cas9 stands for Clustered Regularly Interspaced...
49.3K
CRISPR and crRNAs02:53

CRISPR and crRNAs

16.7K
Bacteria and archaea are susceptible to viral infections just like eukaryotes; therefore, they have developed a unique adaptive immune system to protect themselves. Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats and CRISPR-associated proteins (CRISPR-Cas) are present in more than 45% of known bacteria and 90% of known archaea.
The CRISPR-Cas system stores a copy of foreign DNA in the host genome and uses it to identify the foreign DNA upon reinfection. CRISPR-Cas has three different...
16.7K
Animal Mitochondrial Genetics02:59

Animal Mitochondrial Genetics

7.5K
Among all the organelles in an animal cell, only mitochondria have their own independent genomes. Animal mitochondrial DNA is a double-stranded, closed-circular molecule with around 20,000 base pairs. Mitochondrial DNA is unique in that one of its two strands, the heavy, or H, -strand is guanine rich, whereas the complementary strand is cytosine rich and called the light, or L, -strand. Compared to nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA has a very low percentage of non-coding regions and is marked by...
7.5K
Homologous Recombination02:31

Homologous Recombination

50.2K
The basic reaction of homologous recombination (HR) involves two chromatids that contain DNA sequences sharing a significant stretch of identity. One of these sequences uses a strand from another as a template to synthesize DNA in an enzyme-catalyzed reaction. The final product is a novel amalgamation of the two substrates. To ensure an accurate recombination of sequences, HR is restricted to the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle. At these stages, the DNA has been replicated already and the...
50.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A reporting checklist for large language models in behavioural science.

Nature human behaviour·2026
Same author

Views of the Swiss public towards gene editing.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Digital bioethics: exploring an emerging field.

Medicine, health care, and philosophy·2026
Same author

The impacts of pricing and reimbursement policies on access to cell and gene therapies across Europe.

Journal of community genetics·2026
Same author

Perspectives on the FDA platform technology designation program for the approval of gene therapies: a Swiss multi-stakeholder exploratory interview study.

Orphanet journal of rare diseases·2025
Same author

Typology and Ethical Considerations of Digital Health Promotion Tools for Youth in Sub-Saharan Africa: Review of Examples From Ghana, Kenya, and South Africa.

JMIR formative research·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Establishment of Genome-edited Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines: From Targeting to Isolation
09:51

Establishment of Genome-edited Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines: From Targeting to Isolation

Published on: February 2, 2016

13.6K

Experts' perspectives on human gene editing in Switzerland.

Jade Berlincourt1,2, Sumanie Gächter1, Effy Vayena1

  • 1Health Ethics and Policy Lab, Health Sciences and Technologies Department ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Journal of Community Genetics
|December 19, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Experts in Switzerland generally accept somatic gene editing but are divided on germline gene editing. They stress patient autonomy and regulation, noting concerns about medical tourism due to restrictive laws.

Keywords:
EthicsExpert viewsGene therapyHuman gene editingPolicy recommendationsRegulatory frameworkSwitzerland

More Related Videos

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
08:23

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

Published on: November 1, 2024

515
Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Establishment of Genome-edited Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines: From Targeting to Isolation
09:51

Establishment of Genome-edited Human Pluripotent Stem Cell Lines: From Targeting to Isolation

Published on: February 2, 2016

13.6K
CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing
08:23

CIRCLE-Seq for Interrogation of Off-Target Gene Editing

Published on: November 1, 2024

515
Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e
07:31

Efficient PAM-Less Base Editing for Zebrafish Modeling of Human Genetic Disease with zSpRY-ABE8e

Published on: February 17, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biotechnology
  • Bioethics
  • Medical Law

Background:

  • Limited research exists on expert perspectives regarding Human Gene Editing (HGE).
  • Understanding expert views is crucial for developing informed HGE policies and regulations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore Swiss experts' views on Human Gene Editing (HGE).
  • To assess experts' expectations of Swiss public opinion on HGE.
  • To identify factors influencing HGE perspectives within the unique Swiss context.

Main Methods:

  • Exploratory interviews were conducted with 14 experts (scientists, clinicians, social scientists, lawyers) in Switzerland.
  • Qualitative analysis of interview data explored expert opinions on Somatic Gene Editing (SGE) and Germline Gene Editing (GGE).

Main Results:

  • General acceptance of Somatic Gene Editing (SGE) was observed.
  • Opinions on Germline Gene Editing (GGE) were divided among experts.
  • Participants highlighted the importance of patient autonomy, informed consent, and the need for clear regulations.
  • Concerns were raised about potential healthcare outsourcing and medical tourism due to restrictive regulations on GGE.

Conclusions:

  • Swiss expert opinions on HGE, particularly GGE, show nuances influenced by the national context.
  • There is a recognized need for robust regulatory frameworks for HGE therapies.
  • Cross-cultural research is essential to understand global attitudes towards HGE for tailored international regulations.