Artificial light at night reduces predation and herbivory rates in a nearshore reef
Hei Tung Gabrielle Yeung1, Amelia Caley1, Mariana Mayer-Pinto1
1Centre for Marine Science and Innovation, Evolution and Ecology Research Centre, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Abstract:
Artificial light at night (ALAN) is an escalating anthropogenic stressor that can affect ecological communities over a range of spatial scales by altering key ecological processes, such as predation and herbivory. Shallow subtidal reefs are highly diverse and productive habitats that are vulnerable to ALAN. We investigated rates of consumption by fish (predation and herbivory) under different light treatments (ALAN, dark and daylight conditions) using standardised bioassay methods, i.e. squidpops and Ulva pops in situ. We also used GoPros to record predator identity, number of strikes and time to strike in ALAN and daylight treatments. Contrary to previous studies, we found that predation and herbivory rates were significantly lower in ALAN treatments than in daytime and dark treatments. The highest predation and herbivory rates were observed in daytime treatments. The identity of predator species, time to strike and number of strikes also differed between daytime and ALAN treatments. Due to low light conditions, dark treatments were not filmed. Our findings suggest that ALAN can alter predation in unexpected ways, depending on the environmental conditions and species affected. Future coastal management strategies need to account for light pollution as a major stressor to preserve valuable ecological resources.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Predator-Prey Interactions
Photoreceptors and Plant Responses to Light
Trophic Efficiency
Primary Production
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
Testing a Claim about Mean: Known Population SD
Estimating a population mean requires the samples to be distributed normally. The data should be collected from the randomly selected samples having no sampling bias. The sample size needed to be higher than 30, and most importantly, the population standard deviation should be already known.
In most realistic situations, the population standard deviation is often unknown, but in rare circumstances, when it...


