Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Tackling algorithmic bias and promoting transparency in health datasets: the STANDING Together consensus
Joseph E Alderman1, Joanne Palmer1, Elinor Laws1
1University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, Birmingham, UK; University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
The STANDING Together recommendations address bias in artificial intelligence (AI) health technologies by promoting transparency in health datasets. This initiative aims to prevent AI from worsening health disparities and ensure equitable technology benefits.
Area of Science:
- Health Informatics
- Artificial Intelligence Ethics
- Biomedical Data Science
Background:
- Artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare risks scaling existing health inequalities due to encoded biases.
- Biased data is a primary source of bias in AI health technologies, potentially exacerbating disparities.
- Lack of transparency regarding health dataset limitations hinders equitable AI development and deployment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce the STANDING Together recommendations for addressing bias in AI health technologies.
- To promote transparency in health datasets and encourage proactive evaluation of their impact across diverse populations.
- To guide dataset curators and users in identifying and mitigating algorithmic biases that could worsen health inequalities.
Main Methods:
- Recommendations developed through a systematic review, stakeholder survey, Delphi approach, public consultation, and international interviews.
- Input gathered from over 350 representatives across 58 countries, including 194 Delphi participants from 25 countries.
- Consensus reached on 29 recommendations presented in two parts: Documentation of Health Datasets and Use of Health Datasets.
Main Results:
- 29 consensus recommendations provide guidance for dataset documentation and use to ensure AI health technology safety and effectiveness.
- Recommendations emphasize transparent communication of data limitations as a valuable asset, not a deficiency.
- Focus on proactive inquiry rather than a checklist approach to encourage critical evaluation of AI health technologies.
Conclusions:
- Adoption of STANDING Together recommendations can mitigate risks of AI perpetuating health inequalities.
- Promoting transparency in health datasets is crucial for developing safe, effective, and equitable AI health technologies.
- Encouraging stakeholders to acknowledge and address data limitations is key to realizing the societal benefits of AI in healthcare.
More Related Videos
09:43Databases to Efficiently Manage Medium Sized, Low Velocity, Multidimensional Data in Tissue Engineering
Published on: November 22, 2019
07:41Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Overview of Biostatistics in Health Sciences
Biostatistics: Overview
Discrete variables are...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include: