Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Using a Real-Time Locating System to Measure Walking Activity Associated with Wandering Behaviors Among Institutionalized Older Adults
Published on: February 8, 2019
Perspectives on managing innovation readiness in long-term care: a Q-methodology study
Monique W van den Hoed1,2, Ramon Daniëls3,4,5, Audrey Beaulen3,4
1Department of Health Services Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, Maastricht, 6229 GT, The Netherlands. m.vandenhoed@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Stakeholders identified four key perspectives on innovation readiness in long-term care, highlighting the need for management support and employee participation. While all factors are recognized, there
Area of Science:
- Gerontology
- Healthcare Management
- Innovation Studies
Background:
- Long-term care organizations face resource scarcity, necessitating innovation readiness for affordable elder care.
- Innovation readiness, a measure of organizational maturity for innovation, is crucial for successful implementation.
- Understanding stakeholder views on innovation readiness can inform strategies to enhance innovative capacities in long-term care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore stakeholder perspectives on critical factors for innovation readiness in long-term care organizations for older adults.
- To identify actionable strategies for enhancing the innovative capacities of long-term care providers.
Main Methods:
- Q-methodology, a mixed-methods approach, involving 30 stakeholders in Dutch long-term care.
- Stakeholders ranked 36 statements on innovation readiness importance, derived from literature and interviews.
- By-person factor analysis and post-interviews were used to interpret and describe stakeholder perspectives.
Main Results:
- Four distinct perspectives on innovation readiness were identified: supportive management, client/employee participation, setting direction, and structuring decision-making.
- The 36 statements comprehensively covered known innovation readiness factors, with no new factors emerging.
- Stakeholders acknowledged all innovation readiness factors but differed on their relative importance.
Conclusions:
- While stakeholders agree on the components of innovation readiness, there is no consensus on a single pathway to achieve it.
- A temporal order for innovation readiness factors is suggested, beginning with defining innovation ambition.
- Findings can inform the development of an assessment tool for managers to evaluate organizational innovation readiness.
More Related Videos
11:21Methodology for Establishing a Community-Wide Life Laboratory for Capturing Unobtrusive and Continuous Remote Activity and Health Data
Published on: July 27, 2018
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Methods of Documentation II: POMR
Restorative Care
The Scientific Method in Nursing Process
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
Planning Nursing Care I