Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.5K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.5K
Groupthink01:34

Groupthink

44.1K
When in group settings, we are often influenced by the thoughts, feelings, and behaviors around us. Groupthink is another phenomenon of conformity where modification of the opinions of members in a group aligns with what they believe is the group consensus (Janis, 1972). In such situations, the group often takes action that individuals would not perform outside the group setting because groups make more extreme decisions than individuals do. Moreover, groupthink can hinder opposing trains of...
44.1K
The Representativeness Heuristic02:13

The Representativeness Heuristic

15.8K
The representative heuristic describes a biased way of thinking, in which you unintentionally stereotype someone or something. For example, you may assume that your professors spend their free time reading books and engaging in intellectual conversation, because the idea of them spending their time playing volleyball or visiting an amusement park does not fit in with your stereotypes of professors.
15.8K
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies02:09

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

37.5K
When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...
37.5K
Factors Affecting Perception01:25

Factors Affecting Perception

1.5K
Perception is influenced by perceptual set, context, motivation, and emotion. Perceptual set, or perceptual expectancy, refers to the tendency to perceive things in a particular way, influenced by previous experiences and expectations. This phenomenon affects the interpretation of stimuli, creating a set of mental tendencies and assumptions that impact sensory perceptions of sound, taste, touch, and sight.
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
1.5K
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

5.2K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
5.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Prognostic impact of weight loss during first-line chemotherapy in extensive-disease small cell lung cancer.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

M-Sec promotes the production of infectious HIV-1 virus through the exocyst complex in macrophages.

PLoS pathogens·2026
Same author

The gp120 Envelope Glycoprotein of HIV-1 Triggers Macropinocytosis in Primary CD4+ T Cells to Promote HIV-1 Infection.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab for Malignant Pleural Effusion and Cerebral Edema in Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study.

Thoracic cancer·2026
Same author

Weight change and impact on prognosis in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with concomitant diabetes mellitus treated with sglt2 inhibitors.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2026
Same author

Efficacy of Osimertinib in Patients With Postoperative Recurrent Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Sensitizing EGFR Mutations.

Thoracic cancer·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K

Reputation concern influences perceived leadership.

Akira Ono1, Risa Terazawa2, Yuka Mizuno2

  • 1School of Informatics, Nagoya University, Furō-chō, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya-shi, Aichi, 464-8601, Japan. akira.ssmm@gmail.com.

BMC Research Notes
|December 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary

Individuals with low reputation concerns are favored as leaders in competitive settings, while those with high reputation concerns are preferred in cooperative environments. This highlights context-dependent leadership endorsement based on reputation concerns.

Keywords:
Individual differenceLeadershipLeadership endorsementReputation concernSocial evaluation

More Related Videos

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm
06:18

The Collective Trust Game: An Online Group Adaptation of the Trust Game Based on the HoneyComb Paradigm

Published on: October 20, 2022

2.0K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

634
Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing
06:58

Highlighting and Reducing the Impact of Negative Aging Stereotypes During Older Adults' Cognitive Testing

Published on: January 24, 2020

7.3K

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Leadership Studies

Background:

  • Reputation significantly influences social benefits and individual striving.
  • Concern for reputation varies among individuals.
  • Understanding reputation's role in social evaluations is crucial, especially for leadership.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how varying levels of reputation concern affect leadership suitability.
  • To examine the influence of reputation concerns in both competitive and cooperative contexts.
  • To extend research on factors influencing leadership endorsement.

Main Methods:

  • A pre-registered study involving 363 participants.
  • Participants rated leadership suitability based on profiles of individuals with high or low reputation concerns.
  • Evaluations were conducted in both competitive and cooperative intergroup settings.

Main Results:

  • In competitive settings, low reputation concern individuals received higher leadership endorsement.
  • In cooperative settings, high reputation concern individuals were more likely to be endorsed as leaders.
  • Statistical significance (p < .001) and effect sizes (ηp² = 0.09 and 0.04) were reported for both conditions.

Conclusions:

  • Leadership endorsement is context-dependent regarding an individual's reputation concerns.
  • Low reputation concern is advantageous for leadership in competitive environments.
  • High reputation concern is beneficial for leadership in cooperative environments.