Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 12, 2026

Assessment of Neuromuscular Function Using Percutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Published on: September 13, 2015
Electrodiagnostic Testing Predicts Postdecompression Outcomes in Patients With Cubital Tunnel Syndrome
Kevin R Cuneo1, Thomas J McQuillan2, Constance M Sullivan3
1Department of Orthopaedics, Emory University School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Purpose:
Electrodiagnostic (EDX) testing is commonly used in conjunction with symptoms and physical examination findings to diagnose cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative EDX diagnosis and the degree of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) improvement after surgery within the CuTS patient population.
Methods:
A retrospective review was designed to analyze patients from a single institution who underwent a cubital tunnel release. Patients who had preoperative EDX testing, as well as preoperative and 3-month postoperative QuickDASH scores were eligible for inclusion. These patients were divided into two groups, EDX-positive or EDX-negative, based on the findings of their EDX testing for CuTS. Demographics, preoperative QuickDASH, postoperative QuickDASH, and changes in QuickDASH were compared between the two groups.
Results:
Fifty-seven patients were included-34 EDX-positive and 23 EDX-negative. The EDX-negative cohort had higher preoperative QuickDASH scores, which approached but did not reach significance (P = .06). Both groups had significant improvement in QuickDASH following cubital tunnel release (P = .021, P < .01). Patients with EDX-negative testing had a significantly greater improvement in QuickDASH from before surgery to 3 months after surgery (25 points vs 11, P < .01).
Conclusions:
Patients who underwent cubital tunnel release had a significant short-term improvement in their QuickDASH scores, regardless of EDX diagnosis. However, negative preoperative EDX studies in the setting of strong clinical suspicion of CuTS do not exclude diagnosis and may in fact be a positive, rather than a negative, predictive factor for short-term postoperative functional improvement.
Type Of Study/Level Of Evidence:
Prognostic IV.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies

