Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

83
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
83
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

143
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
143
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

291
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
291
Experimental Designs01:16

Experimental Designs

11.1K
An experimental design is a systematic process that allows researchers to evaluate the relationship between dependent and independent variables. There are three widely used types of experimental design - pre-experimental design, true experimental design, and quasi-experimental design. In pre-experimental design, the researcher compares the data before and after some interventions or treatments. The true-experimental design has more than one purposefully created group, a commonly measured...
11.1K
What is an Experiment?01:12

What is an Experiment?

10.3K
An experiment is a planned activity carried out under controlled conditions. The purpose of an experiment is to investigate the relationship between two variables. When one variable causes change in another, we call the first variable the explanatory or independent variable. The affected variable is called the response or dependent variable. In a randomized experiment, the researcher manipulates values of the explanatory variable and measures the resulting changes in the response variable. The...
10.3K
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

10.9K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
10.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

How work hours affect well-being: A target trial emulation.

PloS one·2026
Same author

Target trial emulation shows that supported causal effects of religious attendance on well-being are selective.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same author

Three evolutionary radiations shaped the evolution of global religious diversity.

Evolutionary human sciences·2025
Same author

Methods in causal inference. Part 3: measurement error and external validity threats.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same author

Methods in causal inference. Part 2: Interaction, mediation, and time-varying treatments.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same author

Methods in causal inference. Part 1: causal diagrams and confounding.

Evolutionary human sciences·2024
Same journal

Gaze in context: non-human eyes can be more salient under ecologically relevant conditions.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

The cultural ecology of social media.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

On the functional redundancy of alcohol tolerance in rice societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Comparing predictions of anger in conflict situations: Recalibrational Theory versus Dark Triad traits.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

Adverse childhood experiences, age at menopause, and vasomotor symptoms among mid-life Latine adults in California.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
Same journal

The evolution of identity signals for co-ordination in diverse societies.

Evolutionary human sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K

Methods in causal inference. Part 4: confounding in experiments.

Joseph A Bulbulia1

  • 1Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

Evolutionary Human Sciences
|December 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Randomized controlled trials aim to eliminate confounding bias, but this study reveals eight persistent sources of bias. Causal inference methods are essential for valid experimental conclusions.

Keywords:
Causal inferenceDAGsRCTevolutionexperimentsintention to treat effectper protocol effect

More Related Videos

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

5.8K
Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
06:45

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal

Published on: April 18, 2017

6.2K
Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study
20:24

Characterization of Complex Systems Using the Design of Experiments Approach: Transient Protein Expression in Tobacco as a Case Study

Published on: January 31, 2014

16.4K

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Confounding bias, where a common cause affects both treatment and outcome, is a major challenge in research.
  • Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are designed to mitigate confounding by randomizing treatment assignment.
  • Despite randomization, biases can still compromise the validity of trial results.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and elucidate the structural sources of bias that can persist in randomized controlled trials.
  • To emphasize the importance of causal inference in experimental design and data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing causal directed acyclic graphs (DAGs) to model relationships between variables.
  • Analyzing the structure of randomized controlled trials to uncover potential sources of bias.

Main Results:

  • Identification of eight distinct structural sources of bias that can affect randomized controlled trials.
  • Demonstration that randomization does not inherently eliminate all forms of confounding bias.

Conclusions:

  • Causal inference methods are critical for addressing persistent biases in randomized controlled trials.
  • Applying causal inference strengthens the validity and reliability of conclusions drawn from experimental data.