Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: A Reproductive Hysteroscopy Approach for Complete Endometrial Polyp Removal and Enhanced Endometrial Receptivity
Published on: August 2, 2024
Repeat hysteroscopic polypectomy: Impact of hysteroscopic instrumentation and provision of anesthesia
Jodi Ezratty1, Zohar Goren1, Yael Tal-Bliman1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shamir Medical Center (Assaf Harofeh), Zerifin, Israel(1).
Study Objective:
To determine the association of repeat polypectomy with patient and/or polyp characteristics, surgical setting, and type of hysteroscopic equipment.
Methods:
Retrospective cohort study including all women who had undergone operative hysteroscopy for the removal of endometrial polyps between 1/2012-12/2022 in our division. Operative hysteroscopy with resection of endometrial polyps was performed using a bipolar loop resectoscope, miniaturized hysteroscopic instruments (bipolar needle, scissors, and graspers), or a tissue-removal device (from April 2021), with or without general anesthesia.
Results:
Benign polyps were removed in 722 women in an outpatient setting and without any anesthesia (n = 64, 8.9 %) or in an operating theatre under general anesthesia (n = 658, 91.1 %). Their mean age was 55.8 ± 12.4 years, 432 (59.8 %) were menopausal, and 41 (5.7 %) reported having previously undergone a polypectomy. The mean size of the resected polyp was 19.9 ± 8.0 mm, and ≥ 2 polyps were removed in 188 (26.0 %) cases. Repeat polypectomy was performed in 32 (4.4 %) women after 3.0 ± 1.9 years, and it was significantly more common among women whose index polypectomy was performed in an outpatient setting (12.5 % versus 3.6 % operating theatre, p = 0.005), and in women who underwent polypectomy by miniaturized hysteroscopic instruments compared with a loop resectoscope or a tissue removal device (8.3 %, 4.2 %, and 0 %, respectively, p = 0.03). On the multivariate analysis, hysteroscopy without anesthesia was significantly associated with repeat polypectomy (odds ratio = 3.5, 95 % confidence interval 1.1-12.1, p = 0.04), while the choice of hysteroscopic equipment was not (odds ratio = 1.1, 95 %, confidence interval 0.3-3.5, p = 0.9). Patient age, menopausal status, and size and number of polyps were not significantly associated with repeat polypectomy.
Conclusions:
Repeat hysteroscopic polypectomy is relatively uncommon and possibly associated with the choice of hysteroscopic equipment and provision of anesthesia.
More Related Videos
05:46Introduction of Intracapsular Rotary-cut Procedures IRCP: A Modified Hysteromyomectomy Procedures Facilitating Fertility Preservation
Published on: January 17, 2019
11:29Surgical Techniques to Optimize Ovarian Reserve during Laparoscopic Cystectomy for Ovarian Endometrioma
Published on: January 22, 2022