Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Criteria for selection of future physicians.

R M Sade, M R Stroud, J H Levine

    Annals of Surgery
    |February 1, 1985
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Routine Use of Ultrasound in the Identification and Management of Thrombosis Following Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization.

    Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2025
    Same author

    Notch signaling is not essential in sonic hedgehog-activated medulloblastoma.

    Oncogene·2010
    Same author

    The cerebroplacental Doppler ratio predicts postnatal outcome in fetuses with congenital heart block.

    Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association·2008
    Same author

    A case of an infant with flail tricuspid valve due to spontaneous papillary muscle rupture: was neonatal lupus the culprit?

    Pediatric cardiology·2007
    Same author

    Practitioners' views.

    The Veterinary record·2006
    Same author

    Risk factors for interstage death after the Norwood procedure.

    Pediatric cardiology·2005

    Selecting medical school candidates requires identifying traits of superior physicians. Focusing on important, yet difficult-to-teach characteristics, ensures better future physician performance over academic achievement alone.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Education
    • Physician Selection
    • Professional Competency

    Background:

    • Academic achievement in medical school does not reliably predict clinical performance.
    • There is a need to identify selection criteria for medical school admissions that identify future superior physicians, not just excellent students.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To determine a valid description of a superior physician.
    • To identify characteristics that are important for superior physicians but difficult to teach, for use in medical school admissions.

    Main Methods:

    • Medical school faculty rated the importance of 87 physician characteristics.
    • The importance ratings were validated against historical data and across subgroups.
    • Faculty also rated the teachability of each characteristic, with validated correlations.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • A highly valid description of a superior physician was established (r = 0.87, p < 0.001).
    • The "nonteachable-important index" (NTII) ranked traits crucial for superior physicians that are inherently difficult to teach.
    • The NTII remained consistent across various subgroups, confirming its robustness.

    Conclusions:

    • The study provides a validated framework for defining superior physicians.
    • The NTII offers a data-driven approach to medical school admissions, prioritizing essential, untaughtable traits.
    • Admissions should focus on selecting candidates with inherent qualities of superior physicians to enhance future clinical practice.