Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethics in Research01:56

Ethics in Research

22.9K
Today, scientists agree that good research is ethical in nature and is guided by a basic respect for human dignity and safety. However, this has not always been the case. Modern researchers must demonstrate that the research they perform is ethically sound.
22.9K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

120
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
120
Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response01:31

Regulation of the Unfolded Protein Response

2.4K
Inositol-requiring kinase one or IRE1 is the most conserved eukaryotic unfolded protein response (UPR) receptor. It is a type I transmembrane protein kinase receptor with a distinctive site-specific RNase activity. As the binding mechanics of the misfolded proteins with the N-terminal domain of IRE-1 are unclear, three binding models — direct, indirect, and allosteric -- are proposed for receptor activation. Nevertheless, it is known that once a misfolded protein associates with IRE1, it...
2.4K
Blind Procedures02:07

Blind Procedures

10.6K
Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which...
10.6K
Applications of IR Spectroscopy: Overview01:11

Applications of IR Spectroscopy: Overview

482
The non-destructive nature and ability to provide valuable chemical information make IR spectroscopy a versatile technique with broad applications in various scientific and industrial fields. IR spectroscopy is commonly used to identify and characterize organic and inorganic compounds. It provides information about the functional groups present in a molecule and the bonding between atoms. This helps in the structural elucidation of compounds during organic synthesis, pharmaceutical research,...
482
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

6.6K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
6.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large language models for deductive qualitative content analysis in dementia-focused embedded pragmatic clinical trials: A comparative methodological study.

Implementation science communications·2026
Same author

Ten Questions for Ethics Committees Evaluating the Strength of Evidence in Support of Early Phase Trials.

Ethics & human research·2026
Same author

Availability of consent forms in ClinicalTrials.gov for industry-sponsored trials.

Health affairs scholar·2025
Same author

Challenges of Conducting Risk-Benefit Analysis of Early Phase Clinical Trials: Results of a National Survey of IRB Chairs.

Ethics & human research·2025
Same author

Why too much biomedical research is often undeserving of the public's trust.

Frontiers in genetics·2025
Same author

Data Parameters From Participatory Surveillance Systems in Human, Animal, and Environmental Health From Around the Globe: Descriptive Analysis.

JMIR public health and surveillance·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.8K

Flying Blind: How Thorough are IRBs when Assessing Scientific Value?

Carol Shum1, Spencer Phillips Hey2, Michael S Wilkes3

  • 1Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, USA.

Journal of General Internal Medicine
|December 20, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) often lack comprehensive guidance on assessing scientific merit in clinical trials. Strengthening these procedures can improve ethical oversight and trial quality.

Keywords:
IRBclinical trialsethicsscientific rigor

More Related Videos

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K
Evaluation of Oxidative Stress in Biological Samples Using the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances Assay
06:19

Evaluation of Oxidative Stress in Biological Samples Using the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances Assay

Published on: May 12, 2020

28.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
07:48

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research

Published on: November 26, 2015

9.8K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.3K
Evaluation of Oxidative Stress in Biological Samples Using the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances Assay
06:19

Evaluation of Oxidative Stress in Biological Samples Using the Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive Substances Assay

Published on: May 12, 2020

28.3K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Research Ethics
  • Regulatory Science

Background:

  • Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are vital for ethical clinical trial conduct in the U.S.
  • IRBs assess scientific merit to justify participant risks, but often lack systematic evaluation.
  • Concerns exist regarding the approval of low-quality clinical trials due to inadequate scientific merit assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the adequacy of guidance provided by IRBs on scientific merit assessment.
  • To analyze Institutional Review Board Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and related materials for scientific merit evaluation criteria.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic pilot investigation of IRB SOPs and guidance documents from U.S. non-profit institutions.
  • Reviewed materials from 35 institutions, selected from FDA's Bioresearch Monitoring Information System database.
  • Assessed guidance on 15 scientific merit dimensions, categorized by PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome).

Main Results:

  • Most IRB materials covered basic elements like study design (99%) and intervention justification (97%).
  • Guidance on critical quality aspects like bias reduction (53%) and outcome measurement (57%) was less frequent.
  • Confounder control was the least represented dimension, mentioned in only 10% of reviewed materials.

Conclusions:

  • IRB guidance on scientific merit is inconsistent, with significant gaps in crucial areas.
  • Enhancing guidance to include all 15 scientific merit dimensions can improve IRB assessments.
  • Comprehensive IRB guidance is essential for robust ethical oversight and higher quality clinical trials.