Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Do targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers improve health outcomes? Evidence from Kenyan decentralization using
Bishnu Bahadur Thapa1, Momotazur Rahman2, Lawrence Were3
1Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, United States of America. bthapa@alumni.princeton.edu.
Background:
As envisioned by the 2010 Constitution, Kenya implemented a devolved system of government in March 2013, setting up 47 counties and a corresponding number of local governments. These counties differed in their levels of development. While counties such as Nairobi and Kiambu led in social and economic indicators, others such as Turkana, Mandera and Wajir were at the bottom of the list. Keeping the between-country disparities and the need to remedy those disparities in mind, the national government used formula-based criteria to determine counties' eligibility for the receipt of financial resources. On the basis of these criteria, counties were classified into marginalized and nonmarginalized counties. The marginalized counties were the 14 (of the 47) most socially and economically disadvantaged counties. These counties receive additional financial resources, which we call targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers (i.e. fiscal transfers from the national government to county governments).
Methods:
We used the difference-in-differences (DID) technique and fixed effects models to estimate the effects of these targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers on human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) incidence and diarrhoea incidence.
Results:
The results revealed that the counties receiving those transfers experienced a statistically significant decline in the incidence of diarrhoea but had no impact on the incidence of HIV. Our study fills a major gap in causal evidence linking intergovernmental fiscal transfers to health outcomes, especially in the context of low-middle-income countries in a newly decentralized setting.
Conclusions:
Our results imply that targeted intergovernmental fiscal transfers may be effective at improving some subnational health outcomes, and therefore in reducing within-country health inequalities.
Related Concept Videos
01:26Methods Of Healthcare Delivery System
Managed Care System:
The managed care system is designed to control the cost while maintaining the quality of care. The patient's care from admission to discharge is planned by the primary care provider or the case manager, also known as the gatekeeper. In a managed care system, the number of care providers is...
01:30Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
01:30Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
01:28International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:30Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...