Appropriate use of vancomycin in a cardiac surgical unit
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: June 12, 2021
Sanaa Mekdad1,2, Leenah Alsayed3, Suzan Alkhalaif3
1King Fahad Medical City, Riyad, Saudi Arabia. smekdad@kfmc.med.sa.
Background:
Antibiotic resistance is a rapidly growing problem. Methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are major worries, particularly in developing nations where cost-effectiveness is essential. Use of vancomycin must be restricted to prevent resistant to it. Examining the appropriateness rate of vancomycin use in light of the recommendations of the Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) in the cardiac surgery ward was the aim of this study.
Methodology:
This study was a retrospective analysis of the medical records of patients who received vancomycin over the previous year, from January 2023 to December 2023. The collected patient data included demographics, indications for vancomycin use, culture and sensitivity test results, concurrent antibiotic medications, vancomycin serum levels, and diagnoses. The appropriateness of vancomycin use was classified according to the recommendations of the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA).
Results:
A total of 294 patients received vancomycin. The appropriate use of vancomycin was significantly higher than its inappropriate use (p = 0.001). Approximately 41% (n = 120) of patients were administered vancomycin for treatment purposes, while the remainder received it empirically, but not as surgical prophylaxis. Appropriate use of vancomycin was observed in 89.1% (n = 262) of patients. However, there remained a notable rate of inappropriate vancomycin use (n = 32, 10.9%). The most common reason for inappropriate use was the continuation of vancomycin beyond 72 h without further evidence of a Gram-positive infection (n = 21, accounting for 65.6% of all inappropriate use).
Conclusions:
The current study demonstrated that 89.1% of vancomycin use was appropriate, while approximately 10% was inappropriate, potentially contributing to vancomycin resistance. The majority of inappropriate use stems from frequent empirical prescribing, which requires further review and monitoring.
Insights
Appropriate vancomycin use was high at 89.1% in cardiac surgery patients, but 10.9% of use was inappropriate, often due to prolonged empirical prescribing, contributing to antibiotic resistance. This highlights the need for better vancomycin stewardship.
Area of Science:
- Medical Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Clinical Pharmacy
Background:
- Antibiotic resistance, including Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE), poses a significant global health threat.
- The judicious use of vancomycin is crucial to mitigate the development of resistance, especially in resource-limited settings.
- Evaluating vancomycin prescribing patterns is essential for antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the appropriateness of vancomycin utilization in a cardiac surgery ward.
- To evaluate vancomycin use against Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) guidelines.
- To identify patterns and reasons for inappropriate vancomycin prescribing.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of medical records for patients receiving vancomycin from January 2023 to December 2023.
- Data collected included patient demographics, vancomycin indications, culture results, concurrent antibiotics, serum levels, and diagnoses.
- Appropriateness was determined based on IDSA guidelines.
Main Results:
- Out of 294 patients, 89.1% received vancomycin appropriately, while 10.9% (32 patients) had inappropriate use.
- The primary reason for inappropriate use was continuing vancomycin beyond 72 hours without documented Gram-positive infection (65.6% of inappropriate cases).
- Vancomycin was used for treatment in 41% of patients and empirically in the remainder, excluding surgical prophylaxis.
Conclusions:
- The study found a high rate of appropriate vancomycin use (89.1%), but a notable 10.9% was inappropriate.
- Inappropriate vancomycin prescribing, particularly prolonged empirical use, may contribute to the rise of vancomycin resistance.
- Enhanced monitoring and review of empirical vancomycin prescribing practices are recommended.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Antiarrhythmic Drugs: Class I Agents as Sodium Channel Blockers
Class 1A Antiarrhythmic Drugs: These drugs work by moderately blocking sodium channels,...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol...

