Low-Gradient Severe Aortic Stenosis: Insights From the CURRENT AS Registry-2
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Tomohiko Taniguchi1, Takeshi Morimoto2, Yasuaki Takeji3
1Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan.
Insights
Low-gradient aortic stenosis (LG AS) with reduced ejection fraction and paradoxical low flow, low gradient (LFLG) AS indicate worse outcomes. Normal flow, low gradient (NFLG) AS shows comparable results to high-gradient AS.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Aortic Stenosis Research
- Clinical Outcomes
Background:
- Low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) remains less understood than high-gradient (HG) AS regarding cardiac damage, frailty, and outcomes.
- Characterizing distinct hemodynamic types of LG AS is crucial for understanding disease progression and patient stratification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical characteristics and outcomes across different hemodynamic subtypes of LG AS and HG AS.
- To identify specific LG AS phenotypes associated with adverse clinical events.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 3,363 patients from the CURRENT AS Registry-2, categorized into four groups: LG AS with reduced LVEF, paradoxical low flow, low gradient (LFLG) AS, normal flow, low gradient (NFLG) AS, and HG AS.
- Exclusion of patients lacking indexed stroke volume or LVEF data.
Main Results:
- LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG AS exhibited more comorbidities, cardiac damage, and frailty, with less severe valve calcification compared to HG AS.
- The 3-year cumulative incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization was higher in LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG AS.
- Adjusted analysis revealed independent associations of LG AS with reduced LVEF (HR: 1.82) and paradoxical LFLG AS (HR: 1.43) with increased risk of death or heart failure hospitalization, unlike NFLG AS (HR: 1.03).
Conclusions:
- Clinical outcomes are significantly worse for LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG AS compared to HG AS.
- NFLG AS demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes to HG AS.
- These findings highlight the importance of differentiating LG AS subtypes for risk stratification and treatment decisions.
Background:
Low-gradient (LG) aortic stenosis (AS) has not been fully characterized compared with high-gradient (HG) AS in terms of cardiac damage, frailty, aortic valve calcification, and clinical outcomes.
Objectives:
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical characteristics and outcomes between each hemodynamic type of LG AS and HG AS.
Methods:
The current study included 3,363 patients in the CURRENT AS (Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis) Registry-2 after excluding patients without indexed stroke volume or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) data. Patients were divided into 4 groups (LG AS with reduced LVEF: n = 285; paradoxical low flow, low gradient [LFLG]: n = 220; normal flow, low gradient [NFLG]: n = 872; HG: n = 1,986).
Results:
Compared with HG AS, LG AS with reduced LVEF more often had cardiovascular comorbidities, advanced cardiac damage, and frailty with less severe valve calcification and paradoxical LFLG AS more often had atrial fibrillation, advanced cardiac damage, and frailty with less severe valve calcification, while NFLG AS had comparable cardiac damage and frailty with less severe valve calcification. Cumulative 3-year incidence of death or heart failure hospitalization was higher in LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG than in HG AS. After adjusting for confounders, LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG compared with HG AS were independently associated with higher risk for death or heart failure hospitalization (HR: 1.82; 95% CI: 1.49-2.23; P < 0.001; and HR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.13-1.82; P = 0.003, respectively) but NFLG AS was not (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.88-1.21; P = 0.68).
Conclusions:
Clinical outcomes were significantly worse in LG AS with reduced LVEF and paradoxical LFLG AS and comparable in NFLG AS compared with HG AS.
More Related Videos
12:17Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Regurgitation II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation I: Introduction
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT