Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective

Kiyoung Sung1, Sanguk Hwang2, Jaeheon Lee1

  • 1Department of Surgery, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

BMC Surgery
|December 21, 2024
PubMed

Insights

Postoperative outcomes in gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) patients are predicted by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, albumin levels, and body temperature. These factors are crucial for identifying high-risk patients and improving critical care strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Surgery
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Gastroenterology

Background:

  • Gastrointestinal perforation (GIP) is a critical surgical emergency requiring immediate intervention.
  • Standardized acute care surgery (ACS) frameworks are essential for managing GIP patients.
  • Identifying prognostic factors is vital for optimizing GIP patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify independent prognostic factors for mortality and morbidity in GIP patients treated within an ACS framework.
  • To evaluate the predictive accuracy of identified factors using statistical models.
  • To inform evidence-based postoperative critical care strategies for GIP.

Main Methods:

  • Single-center retrospective cohort study of 354 GIP patients undergoing emergent surgery and ICU admission (January 2013 - March 2023).
  • Analysis of initial and postoperative Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores, postoperative body temperature, peritonitis extent, surgical approach, and postoperative albumin levels.
  • Utilized Random Forest models to determine feature importance for predicting survival and complications.

Main Results:

  • Overall mortality was 11%; 38% of survivors experienced severe complications (Clavien-Dindo class III+).
  • Independent predictors of mortality included initial SOFA, postoperative SOFA (p-SOFA), and postoperative body temperature.
  • Independent predictors of morbidity included peritonitis extent, open surgery, postoperative albumin, and p-SOFA scores.
  • Random Forest analysis highlighted p-SOFA and postoperative albumin as key predictors for both survival and complications.
  • Specific combinations of high p-SOFA, low albumin, and low body temperature indicated 100% mortality.

Conclusions:

  • Rapid preoperative assessment, accurate surgery, and evidence-based postoperative care are crucial for GIP management.
  • Postoperative SOFA scores, albumin levels, and body temperature are critical indicators for predicting patient outcomes.
  • Implementing a system to assess these factors can lead to more detailed patient evaluations and improved care.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management01:28

Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management

Esophageal perforations manifest in various clinical forms, influenced by factors such as the perforation's cause and location (cervical, intrathoracic, or intra-abdominal), the extent of contamination, and potential injury to adjacent mediastinal structures. The timing between the perforation occurrence and treatment initiation also affects the clinical presentation.
Clinical Manifestations:
44
Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction01:22

Esophageal Perforation-I: Introduction

Esophageal perforation is a severe medical condition characterized by a breach in the integrity of the esophageal wall. This breach can occur due to various factors such as trauma, medical procedures, or underlying diseases. When the esophageal wall is compromised, it allows food, fluids, and digestive juices into the chest cavity or adjacent structures, leading to potential complications and health risks.
The location of esophageal perforation can vary, occurring anywhere along the esophagus....
68
Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care01:25

Peptic Ulcer Disease V: Surgical Management and Nursing Care

Surgical management and nursing care are crucial in treating Peptic Ulcer Disease (PUD). Here is an organized and enhanced overview of the surgical interventions and the associated nursing care for PUD:
Surgical Interventions for Peptic Ulcer Disease
228
Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management01:29

Appendicitis-II: Diagnostic Studies and Management

Diagnosing and managing appendicitis requires a structured and comprehensive approach that spans from initial assessment to postoperative care. Here is an overview of the process:
Diagnosing Appendicitis
It requires a multifaceted approach, starting with a detailed physical examination to pinpoint the location and nature of the pain and identify any associated symptoms. Laboratory tests play a crucial role. A complete Blood Count (CBC) typically reveals leukocytosis (an increased number of...
64
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management01:21

Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management

Surgical interventions for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), which includes ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are essential in managing symptoms and addressing complications. The selection of surgical procedures is contingent upon the specific conditions and complications that stem from these illnesses.
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
116
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy01:26

Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy

Sigmoidoscopy and laparoscopy are distinct medical procedures that enable physicians to internally inspect different parts of the GI tract. Although they serve different purposes, each is essential for diagnosing and, in some cases, treating various medical conditions.
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
48