Related Experiment Video
Updated: May 5, 2026

In Vitro Methods for Comparing Target Binding and CDC Induction Between Therapeutic Antibodies: Applications in Biosimilarity Analysis
Published on: May 4, 2017
Comparing immunogenicity and safety following transition from reference rituximab to biosimilar rituximab (DRL_RI) in
Narendra Maharaj1, Dharma Rao Uppada2, Naveen Reddy2
1Clinical Development - Biologics, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Bachupally, Hyderabad, 500090, India. narendramaharaj@drreddys.com.
Objectives:
To assess immunogenicity and safety in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) transitioning from rituximab [US-licensed rituximab: Reference Product (RP); EU-approved rituximab: Reference Medicinal Product (RMP)] to DRL_RI (proposed rituximab biosimilar), in comparison to those continuing on RP/RMP.
Methods:
This double-blind, randomized, Phase 3 study included 140 RA patients having prior exposure to RP/RMP; transitioned to DRL_RI (n = 70) or continued with RP/RMP (n = 70) for two 1000 mg infusions on Days 1 and 15. Assessments included Time-matched Rituximab Concentration (TMRC), anti-drug antibodies (ADAs), neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) and ADA titre over 12 weeks, and safety follow-up till 26 weeks.
Results:
The mean age of subjects was 59.8 years (range: 24, 86) and the mean BMI was 27.76 kg/m2 (range: 17.5, 52.0). Incidence of ADA after dosing was low in both groups: 1.4% in DRL_RI group on Day 15, Week 8, and Week 12; and 2.9% in RP/RMP group at Week 12. Only 1 patient in DRL_RI group was positive for NAbs at Week 8. ADA titre values did not significantly differ between the two groups. The time-matched rituximab concentration was comparable between groups, indicating no interference for immunogenicity assessment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by 34.3% and 38.6% patients, respectively, in DRL_RI and RP/RMP groups. Incidences of TEAEs that were drug-related, leading to treatment discontinuation, grade ≥ 3, or serious, were also comparable.
Conclusion:
Immunogenicity was low and comparable in RA patients transitioning to DRL_RI or continuing on RP/RMP. The overall safety profile in patients transitioning to DRL_RI did not appear to differ in frequency, severity, or quality from patients continuing on RP/RMP and was in line with the known safety profile of rituximab.
Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT0426877 EudraCT:2019-002810-37 US IND 112766.
Related Concept Videos
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Drug Products: Biologics, Biosimilars and Interchangeables
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications

