The Extracellular Matrix
Asymmetric Lipid Bilayer
The Extracellular Matrix
Elastin is Responsible for Tissue Elasticity
Overview of Cell-Matrix Interactions
Lipid-derived Compounds in the Human Body
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 23, 2026

Non-chromatographic Purification of Recombinant Elastin-like Polypeptides and their Fusions with Peptides and Proteins from Escherichia coli
Published on: June 9, 2014
This study explored how human plasma lipoproteins interact with elastin, a protein found in connective tissues. Using a washout technique and radiolabeled lipoproteins, the researchers measured both reversible and irreversible binding. They found that low-density and high-density lipoproteins bind to elastin in a saturable manner, with irreversible binding increasing as lipoprotein concentration rises. At a concentration of 1.5 mg per milliliter, reversible and irreversible interactions were equally strong. The results suggest that lipoprotein-elastin interactions are complex and concentration-dependent, with both types of binding playing a role.
10:01Directed Assembly of Elastin-like Proteins into defined Supramolecular Structures and Cargo Encapsulation In Vitro
Published on: April 8, 2020
07:26Stimulation of Vascular Endothelial Cells Using Neutrophil Extracellular Traps in the Presence of Low-Density Lipoprotein
Published on: August 12, 2025
Area of Science:
Background:
Prior research has shown that lipoproteins interact with extracellular matrix components, but the nature of these interactions remains unclear. Established knowledge includes the role of lipoproteins in lipid transport and their association with atherosclerosis. However, the specific binding mechanisms with elastin have not been fully characterized. This gap motivated a closer examination of binding dynamics between plasma lipoproteins and elastin. No prior work had resolved whether these interactions are primarily reversible or irreversible. The study builds on existing work by applying a washout technique to quantify binding coefficients. It was already known that lipoprotein binding could be saturable, but the extent of this saturation in elastin systems was uncertain. This paper contributes by providing quantitative measures of both reversible and irreversible interactions.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study was to investigate how human plasma lipoproteins interact with elastin from bovine ligamentum nuchae. The focus was on distinguishing between reversible and irreversible binding mechanisms. The researchers sought to quantify these interactions using radiolabeled lipoproteins and a washout method. The motivation was to better understand the binding behavior of LDL and HDL with elastin. This uncertainty drove the need for a controlled experimental setup. The study aimed to measure Ki and Kr coefficients to assess binding saturation. The researchers wanted to compare their findings with prior studies using human aortic elastin. This approach allowed them to evaluate the consistency of binding mechanisms across different elastin sources.
Main Methods:
The study used radiolabeled human plasma lipoproteins and bovine ligamentum nuchae elastin. A washout technique was employed to separate reversible and irreversible interactions. The Ki coefficient was calculated to measure irreversible binding. The Kr coefficient was used to quantify reversible partitioning. Lipoprotein concentrations ranged from 0.1 to 1.5 micrograms per milliliter. The incubation medium contained 1.5 mg per milliliter of total protein. Radiolabeling allowed precise tracking of binding events. The washout method ensured distinct separation of binding types.
Main Results:
For both LDL and HDL, Ki values decreased with increasing lipoprotein concentration. This suggests that irreversible binding is saturable. The Ki values were comparable to those from human aortic elastin studies. Kr values remained constant across the tested concentration range. At 1.5 mg per milliliter protein, reversible interactions matched irreversible ones in magnitude. The Ki values for LDL and HDL were similar in magnitude. Radiolabeled tracking confirmed distinct binding phases. The washout technique provided clear separation of binding types.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest that both LDL and HDL interact with elastin through saturable mechanisms. The Ki values indicate that irreversible binding increases with lipoprotein concentration. The Kr values suggest that reversible interactions are concentration-independent. At high protein concentrations, reversible and irreversible interactions are comparable. The findings align with prior studies using human aortic elastin. The researchers propose that the binding behavior is consistent across elastin sources. The study supports the idea that lipoprotein-elastin interactions are complex and concentration-dependent. The authors emphasize the importance of distinguishing between reversible and irreversible binding mechanisms.
The study found that both LDL and HDL bind to elastin through saturable mechanisms, with irreversible binding increasing as lipoprotein concentration rises.
A washout technique was used to separate reversible and irreversible interactions, with Ki and Kr coefficients quantifying each type.
At this concentration, reversible interactions matched irreversible ones in magnitude, indicating a balance between the two types of binding.
Radiolabeling allowed precise tracking of lipoprotein binding events, distinguishing between reversible and irreversible interactions.
The Ki values were similar in magnitude to those from studies using human aortic elastin, suggesting consistent binding behavior across sources.
The findings suggest that lipoprotein binding to elastin is complex and concentration-dependent, with both reversible and irreversible components.