Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 4, 2025

Scanning Electron Microscopic Evaluation of Surface Defects of Remover Retreatment File After Single and Multiple Uses
Published on: October 11, 2024
Factors associated with the success of restorative treatment for root caries: A systematic review with meta-analysis
Yulin Wen1, Xiaowei Zhao1, Samantha Kar Yan Li1
1Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
Objectives:
The aims of this systematic review were to estimate the success rates of root caries restorations, and to identify possible factors associated with the success of root caries restorations.
Data And Sources:
Literature search was conducted in three databases, PubMed, MEDLINE and Web of Science to identify clinical studies reporting on the success of restorative treatment for root caries. Factors that may influence clinical outcomes of the restorative treatment were summarized and analyzed.
Study Selection:
A total of 4116 records were identified, and 9 articles were eligible to be included. A total of 415 participants with 1174 root caries restorations were analyzed. The short-term (6-month) estimated success rates (ESRs) (95 % CI) of root restorations with per protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat (ITT) approach were 95.1 % (92.9 % to 97.3 %) and 90.5 % (86.8 % to 94.1 %), respectively. The long-term (24-month) ESRs were 82.2 % (73.9 % to 90.6 %) and 73.8 % (64.0 % to 83.5 %) by using the PP and ITT approaches, respectively. Resin composite restorations had a higher ESR compared to glass ionomer cement restorations at 12-month follow-up (96.3 % vs. 86.9 %, p = 0.037), but no significant differences were found at 6-month and 24-month follow-ups (p > 0.05). Besides filling material, no other factors with statistically significant association with treatment success could be identified, including study setting, material mixing method, moisture control method, use of liner or not, and restorative technique.
Conclusion:
The overall success rate of root caries restorations is good in the short-term (6-month) but decreases over time, with an approximately 20 % failure rate after two years. Complete/partial loss of restoration and gross marginal defect were the main reported reasons accounted for failure. No studied factor has clear evidence to support its association with long-term (24 months or longer) success of root caries restoration.
Clinical Significance:
This review provides up-to-date evidence on the overall success rates of root caries restorations. No compelling evidence shows any studied factor is related to the long-term success of root caries restoration, whilst there is a tendency to observe higher success rates of resin composite compared to glass ionomer cement restorations.
More Related Videos
07:07Development of a Direct Pulp-capping Model for the Evaluation of Pulpal Wound Healing and Reparative Dentin Formation in Mice
Published on: January 12, 2017
05:42Detection and Removal of Tooth-Colored Composite Resin Using the Fluorescence-Aided Identification Technique
Published on: July 27, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Tooth Anatomy
The Crown, Neck, and Root
The visible part of the tooth is referred to as the crown. It's covered by enamel, the hardest substance in the human body. The crown is uniquely shaped for each type of tooth, allowing for different functions such as cutting, tearing, or...
Teeth
In the bud stage, the tooth germ (an aggregation of cells) starts to form in the developing jawbone. During the cap stage, the tooth germ differentiates into enamel organ, dental papilla, and dental sac, which will later develop into the tooth's enamel, dentin...
Restorative Care